Monday, 18 December 2017

WHAM! #80 - COMPLETE CHRISTMAS ISSUE FROM 1965...

Images copyright relevant owner

Here's an early Christmas gift for all you Criv-ites around my age - the complete WHAM! #80 from December 1965, to rekindle your memories of this weekly paper if you were a reader at the time.  Perhaps you had this very issue, and now you're reunited with it after a mere 52 years - doesn't time fly?!  For myself, I didn't start buying Wham! until after it began featuring The FANTASTIC FOUR in late 1966, and by then the comic had lost its photogravure printing and was published on cheap newsprint paper.  The reasons for this were down to expense, obviously, as the comic hadn't performed as well as had been expected when it was launched in 1964, so cost-cutting measures had to be implemented.

However, the comic was yet being printed in its original format in December '65, which creates a strange paradox for me.  Y'see, between the time of Wham! coming out and me first buying it, I'd lived in three different houses, and when I started getting the comic, it was in the cheap newsprint format.  That's why I associate Wham! as I knew (and remember) it with the house I was then in, whereas its previous format 'belonged' to the time of my two prior houses - though not to my memories of the houses themselves, as I was completely unaware of the title at that time. Consequently, to see this December 1965 photogravure copy from the time I was living in my third house is rather confusing for me as, to my mind, it just doesn't 'fit' my recollections of this particular period of my life.  To me at this time, Wham! was a newsprint comic, not a photogravure one.

Anyway, enough self-indulgent prattle from me, though it's a small price to pay for the treat that now awaits you.  You may now indulge yourself in these comic glories from over 50 years ago. Some strips show background 'bleed-through' from the previous page, which I've lessened slightly, but I can't remove it completely without wiping out detail on the side you're reading.   




Were you one of the winners of a copy of this LP?  Imagine what they're worth now















WHIZZER & CHIPS FIRST CHRISTMAS ISSUE COVERS - PLUS BONUS...

Images copyright REBELLION

I've shown these comic strip images before, but there's a couple of good reasons why I'm repeating them.  Firstly, it's the run-up to Christmas, and secondly, I own the original art to one of the interior pages.  Namely, court jester STEADFAST McSTAUNCH (who used to be a dog in the original KNOCK-OUT, drawn by the same artist), and who, along with HARRY'S HAUNTED HOUSE, GINGER'S TUM and ODDBALL, were my three favourite strips in the comic.  So enjoy looking back to 1969 (whether you were around at the time or not) and then savour the art of DENIS GIFFORD - panel-by-panel - of the last of Steadfast's continuing weekly adventures before he became a presenter of jokes and puzzles in the very next issue.  I was disappointed to see his strip disappear at the time, and I'm surprised to be reminded that his quest lasted for only 11 issues.  It seemed much longer than that to me back then, but when you're young, time seems to pass slower, doesn't it?

More Christmas images soon, Criv-ite chums. 




Yeah, yeah, I know I've shown the following panels before as well, but that was a good while back.  It doesn't hurt to remind you that this blog has occasionally featured some great stuff amongst the dross.  Good ol' Steadfast - he was one of my childhood chums.













Sunday, 17 December 2017

BABE Of The DAY - VALENTINA KRYP...



VALENTINA KRYP is a Cosplayer
with a huge fan-following on the Internet.
She's debuting as a 'babe of the day' in more
simple attire, but we'll see her in one of her
Cosplay outfits before very long.  (And in
full-colour too.)  Can't wait, eh?

Saturday, 16 December 2017

RECOMMENDED CHRISTMAS READING: DON'T MISS OUT!

Image copyright D.C. THOMSON & Co., Ltd

Here are three comics I read recently and quite enjoyed.  First up is The BEANO Christmas issue.  Ridiculously overpriced at £4.50 because of the inclusion of poly-bagged tat, the comic itself is an enjoyable read, especially the DENNIS The MENACE strip.  It's a bit surreal in its premise, but thanks to the inclusion of a magnificently cute, lie-detecting tiny robot, it actually made me laugh out loud more than once.  Well done to both writer and artist.

Image copyright REBELLION

Next up is the 2000 A.D. Christmas edition, and much to my surprise, I found it entertaining and didn't shake my head in disbelief or derision at any of the stories contained within.  Much more violent than I remember, it seems aimed at an older readership than was once the case, and its £4.99 price tag is more palatable due to the fact that it has 100 pages.  It certainly won't disappoint long-term readers and may even attract a few new ones.

Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

Lastly, The MIGHTY WORLD OF MARVEL #16 (Vol 6) provides my nostalgia fix because I was buying the weekly incarnation of this great title 45 years ago.  Although The CHAMPIONS are the main-named cover stars, it's The GUARDIANS Of The GALAXY strip that's the more entertaining read in my view.  Considering what it would've cost to buy the three original individual titles reprinted within, £3.99 for 76 full-colour pages is indeed a bargain.  My local WHS appears to have been ordering fewer numbers of this mag in recent months, so sales may be in decline.  Rush out and buy a copy and give it a little boost, eh?

Okay, that's your lot for now.  Be sure to drop in again on this, the finest blog in the universe, to see what's on offer for all you discerning Criv-ites.

Image copyright D.C. THOMSON & Co., Ltd

Friday, 15 December 2017

ANOTHER BABE Of The DAY - SYBIL DANNING...



The lovely Sybil Danning has just been for a swim to cool down after looking at a photo of me naked.  (Me that is, not her.)  Seems I got her all 'hot under the collar'.  Figuratively speaking of course, as she's not wearing a collar.  In fact, she's nearly not wearing anything.  Don't about the rest of you Crivs, but I'm extremely grateful to the lady for that fact.

KLASSIC KIRBY KOMIC KOVERS: MWOM #15...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Well, okay... I'm cheating a little.  However, the above pin-up was the back cover of The MIGHTY WORLD Of MARVEL #15 back in 1973, so it qualifies under the description because of that.  I've also included the JIM STARLIN front cover (below) just so you don't feel shortchanged.  (And yes, you're right - that SPIDEY drawing does looks as if it might be a ROMITA patch.  If so, that's three artists for the price of one (not counting the inkers), so whatcha all complaining about?

Incidentally, the Saturday this comic came out (January 6th, the cover's dated a week ahead) was the day we got our first dog, PRINCE.

BABE Of The DAY - ANNA BOR...



Here's the stunning-looking ANNA
BOR... looking stunning!  (H'mm, that last
 bit may be just a little bit redundant.)

SILVER BELLS...



Time for another JIM REEVES' Christmas song.
I'd ask you to sing along, but you'll be too relaxed
and chilled out listening to Jim to be able to.

Thursday, 14 December 2017

REVOLTECH THUNDERBIRD 2...



Sadly, my photos of my newly arrived REVOLTECH THUNDERBIRD 2 didn't come out too well, but I'll use them until I can take sharper ones.  In fact, I'll publish the 'official' ones just now as well, the better to show you what a great collectable this is.  This usually sells for around £90 (sometimes more), but I got mine for a third of that, post free from Japan.  Wotta bargain, eh?  If you're quick you may be as lucky as I was, so cop a gander at eBay now.


And below are some 'proper' pics so you can see it in all its non-blurred glory.  I wish I could show you the highly-detailed interior of the pod, but take my word on it - it's ace.  And the TB4 is smaller even than the MATCHBOX and CORGI ones.




A CHANGE IS AS GOOD AS A REST - OR IS IT? WHAT DO YOU THINK...?


"A distinctive quality or atmosphere."  That's one of the definitions of the word 'flavour'.  And each and every neighbourhood I've ever lived in has had its own distinct flavour.  Whether it was intrinsic, or just the way I perceived things, I'm not quite sure; perhaps a little of both.  In the latter case, if you live in the same house and area for many years, that perception can change with age, because when you're a kid and the territory is your playground, the way you view your surrounding environs differs from when you're an adult and it's only the place where you live.  As a grown-up, you no longer play in the woods and climb the trees, or go exploring the boundaries of your locale with your pals, so your perception (and thus the flavour) of the place likely adapts to your shifting experience of it.

In my case, I know that my neighbourhood no longer 'tastes' exactly as it did when I was a teenager.  That's due to various reasons, many of them ones of style.  For example, the pavements no longer have light grey slabs, but instead sport a dark tar macadam.  Street lights are no longer painted light grey, but for many years were of a much darker hue before being replaced with bare aluminium ones.  The designs of the cars parked in the street are totally different to cars of the '70s.  There are fewer green spaces for kids to play, and the horizons are narrowing because of new edifices blotting out the sky.  Even something as seemingly trivial as the shape and colour of window frames can alter the mood of a street in quite a significant way.  The 'feeling' I now experience of my surroundings when I leave my house to go shopping or visiting is not the same as when I was a teenager or young adult on my way to school or work, or simply going to see friends.

But there's another factor.  When I was younger, lingering thoughts of mortality did not concern me with quite the same intensity as they do nowadays (after all, the prospect of death seems far more remote in youth), and I had a sense of optimism about life.  Free from the worry of earning a living, or securing a future and raising a family, when I was a kid life seemed like one big adventure and I couldn't wait to see what a new day would bring.  Now, rapidly approaching old age and in physical and intellectual decline, I fear for the future and could see tomorrow far enough (except when waiting for some item purchased on eBay to arrive).  All those different factors coalesce to alter not only my perception of my place in the scheme of things, but also to change the 'scheme of things' itself.  A two-pronged attack as it were.

Perhaps it's a mistake to stay in the same environment for any significant length of time.  Maybe people need to change their surroundings every so often, otherwise the taste of daily living becomes stale and no more than an endless repetition of things that no longer satisfy, no longer inspire.  True, the pattern of life is pretty much the same wherever we live, but the illusion of 'freshness' and 'newness' that comes with a change of locale is perhaps the closest we'll ever get to feeling that our daily grind has been infused with new 'life'.

Are you an adult who's lived in the same house since you were a kid?  If so, do you recognise what I'm trying to say, or does the continuity of your life from infancy afford a comfort that you'd be loath to relinquish?  Or do you sometimes feel suffocated by it and yearn for change?  Particularly if the place as you once knew it no longer seems the same, and you're merely clinging on to the ghost of a memory of how things used to be.  If you can make head or tail of what I've been rabbiting on about, I'd be interested in reading your thoughts in the comments section.      

BABE Of The DAY - ALEX KINGSTON...



ALEX KINGSTON looks great in this lacey-
racy outfit, I'm sure you'll all agree.  Or maybe I'm
mistaken and it's an all-over body tattoo.  Not that
it matters - either way, she still looks great.

Wednesday, 13 December 2017

AN EMAIL FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP...



Con men appear to be getting either more inventive or desperate in their attempts to separate people from their cash.  Here's one of their most recent emails to me (and no doubt countless others), allegedly from someone they must believe has far more credibility than he actually possesses.  Would you ever fall for such a scam?

United States President Office
The White House
Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW,
Washington, DC 20500, United States.

*************24 HRS SERVICE ***************

Your ATM Visa Card Will Be Shipped Through DHL To Your Address:

Dear Beneficiary,

I am Mr. Donald John Trump, the newly President-elect of the United States. You will get more information about me here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald Trump

This is to inform you officially that after our investigations with the Federal Bureau of Investigation {FBI}, Central Intelligence Agency {CIA} and other Security Agencies in the country for the year 2017, we discovered that you have not receive your Outstanding Compensation Payments valued $10.5 Million, I Just received an urgent email from Mr. Mike Parra, the Dispatch Director of DHL Couriers Express that your ATM VISA Card worth $10.5 Million Dollars which I sent to you from The White House has been returned back to my office due to wrong address provided, I advise you to reconfirm Your Full Name, your Correct House Address, Phone Number, Occupation and Age to enable me resend the compensation ATM Visa Card to you immediately.

I have your file here in my office and it says that you are yet to receive your fund valued at US$10,500,000.00 (Ten Million Five hundred thousand Dollars).This Funds will now be delivered to you Via ATM VISA Card or your preferred payment option. Note that your loaded ATM VISA Card will be mailed to you through Priority Mail Express (DHL) to your designated address address immediately you admit full compliance to this email. You are advised to kindly reply this email with the above details to help ensure safe mailing of your ATM Visa Card:

As soon as the above mentioned details are received, your ATM Visa Card worth $10.5 Million USD will be delivered to your house address without any further delay, I am very sorry for the delay you have gone through in the past years. Thanks for adhering to this instruction and once again accept my congratulations in advance.

Thanks for your co-operation as I wait to hear from you.

Signed:
Yours Faithfully,
Mr. Donald John Trump.
President of the United States of America.

WHERE WERE YOU IN 1982? DID YOU TAKE A NOTE?


Long ago and far away, in another age to the one in which we all now live, I was a different kind of chappie.  Happy, content, optimistic, and with a feeling of eternity in my grasp.  I knew one day I would die (or so I'd been told, though I was looking for a clause in the contract), but that day seemed so far off as to appear unimaginable.  Now, of course, with less time in front of me than I have behind me, it's a different story (though I'm still searching for that clause), and I often find myself looking back on earlier years to when I was young, and fit, and handsome(ish), and master of all I surveyed.  (In my imagination anyway.)

So for today's exercise in nostalgia, we're returning to 1982 (though we'll bob around a bit).  If you're around my age, that date will trip off the tongue as if it were only a fairly recent period (isn't it?) - but no, it's an astonishing 35 years ago and counting.  Wow, 35 years.  I have friends who died long before they ever reached that age, yet it only feels like a few short years - months even - since I last saw and spoke with them.  But I digress.  The book at the top of this post was given to me by a friend (along with his old brown wallet) in December of 1980, when he was back in our home town on a brief visit up from Portsmouth, where he then lived as he was in the Navy.

In the interests of full disclosure, he's no longer my friend and hasn't been since April of 1981, but that's another story.  The Reader's Digest account is that he was a compulsive liar and inveterate fantasist, and when I went down to Portsmouth to visit him (at his invitation) in '81, he studiously avoided me - and the only time he came to visit was when I was out and to question my landlady as to whether I'd returned to Scotland yet.  I presume he was so worried I'd meet his new band of acquaintances and perhaps inadvertently expose some of the ludicrous fantasies he'd regaled them with, that he gave me a wide body-swerve for the entire time (three or four months) I was there.  It was then that I decided I didn't need friends like that.

The book and wallet were the two last things he ever gave me the final time I saw him in the town we'd grown up in.  He no longer required the wallet as his sister had recently given him a new one for Christmas, which was then fast approaching.  I still have both items, and the notebook is filled (by me) with notes, scraps, sayings, quotations and pictures.  (The wallet remains empty.)  One of those pictures is a very poor quality 110mm photo of the time I appeared on TV in early 1982.  To be more precise, I didn't appear in person, it was a photo of me taken in my room by a photographer (no surprise there then) for a consumer segment on a news and current affairs programme on Scottish Television.


The reason for my involvement?  I'd purchased several comics (at no small cost) from a mail order dealer towards the end of 1980 or the beginning of '81, and he'd failed to send one of the issues.  (SMCW #1 in case you were wondering.)  After many fruitless letters, one of them from a lawyer, I got in touch with the programme (Scotland Today perhaps, can't quite recall) and they contacted him.  The comic was soon forthcoming, and the details were broadcast on the programme, hence a picture of my good self being required.  I wasn't supplied with a copy, so had to snap a couple of photos of the TV screen from a video recording of the programme made by a woman whose hall I was decorating at the time.  Both pictures had a dark bar across them, one along the top-middle of one image, one along the lower-middle of the other.  I cut the two of them in half, thereby removing most of the bar, joined the good halves together (with no great finesse as you can see above) and then glued the result inside the notebook.

Anyway, I was browsing through the book in the early hours of this morning, saw the photo and was appalled by how awful it looked.  I scanned it into my computer and set to work in trying to improve it by the use of digital technology (and perseverance), and though the finished result (below) is far from perfect, I'd say it's a wee bit better than the original.  At least it now looks like one photo as opposed to two halves taped together (which it was).

Incidentally, I still own that TV in the pic (though it's now in the loft) and the items on top of it, and the poster you can faintly see on the right of the photo still resides on that same spot (more or less) on my bedroom wall.  It's a The Wind In The Willows poster that I acquired from the Westwood Library in 1979, when I was there on a visit from Central Library, where I worked at the time.  As I used to live across the street from the Westwood Library when I was a boy (though not in '79), it has a particular significance to me. 

Well, that's today's nostalgic reminiscence out of the way and you're all now free to return to your normal lives.  At the back of your minds though, a seed has been planted, and you'll probably find yourselves, without really meaning to, thinking back on your own youth and what you were up to in the early '80s.  I trust all your memories are pleasant ones.

"Here's lookin' at you, Kid!"

Monday, 11 December 2017

CAN BATMAN FLY? S*D THAT FOR A GAME OF SOLDIERS...


Back in the '60s, one of my pals used to have the above MARX TOYS soldier.  I had the Marx Toys BATMAN, which shared the same face as his military colleague, and, for reasons now forgotten, we decided to swap.  As related in another post some time back, while we were playing in the field across the road from my house a short while later, an older boy by the name of ROBERT FORTUNE decided to see if Batman could fly and launched him into space, with catastrophic results (which I'm sure he intended).

My pal immediately wanted to annul the swap, but I was having none of it.  He owned Batman when he met his fate, so he had to live with the results.  We complained to Robert Fortune's mother, who said she'd tell him off, but we could tell she wanted to get back to her telly and was unconcerned with her son's behaviour.  And to think there are parents who sometimes wonder why their children turn out the way they do, eh?

Anyway, saw the toy on eBay a while back and thought about bidding on it, but never got around to it.  Thought I'd show you a photo of it anyway, just to remind you what it looked like in case you had this toy when you were a boy.  And that's Batman below, though you can't see his face for a black-mask sticker over it.  (Trust me, they were twins.)

Any Criv-ites have either (or both) of these items when they were kids?  Share your reminiscences of them in the comments section.

******

Update: Since first publishing this post, I've acquired two of the above soldier.  (I'll pretend one of them is Batman out-of-costume.)

******

Further update: I've now also come into possession of the Batman figure.

BABE Of The DAY - GAL GADOT...



GAL GADOT borrowed one of
CUPID's darts to shoot at me.  She
needn't have tried so hard to win my
adoration - that would've happened
 anyway without any prompting.

Saturday, 9 December 2017

RECOMMENDED READING: DC KIRBY KLASSICS...

Images copyright DC COMICS

DC COMICS are producing some nice softcover collections of JACK KIRBY classics at the moment, very much in the mode of MARVEL's EPIC volumes.  The current ones I'm aware of ('cos I have 'em) are CHALLENGERS Of The UNKNOWN, MISTER MIRACLE, and The DEMON, but there may be others and there's certainly bound to be more to come.  Well worth having if you're a Kirby fan.





Oddly, this scan's yellow isn't reproducing properly, so you'll have to imagine how it should be