Monday, 13 July 2026

(Part Two) "...LIKE A WOMAN SCORNED..."


Okay, so where were we?  Let me give you a little background on the woman I was telling you about in part one.  She wasn't too popular with other staff, considering herself to be the boss's 'pet', and she often tried to 'lord it' over them, with not much resistance due to her perceived status.  Indeed, rumours were rife that she and the boss were having or had had an affair, though truth to tell, I myself never saw any evidence of it, but a helluva lot of staff believed it to be true and had stories to tell about it.  I almost wish it were true, as then I'd have another means by which to expose her for what she is, but I've never been one to make accusations unless I know they're 100% true and accurate.  However, the two of them certainly appeared to be close.

Anyway, to recap a little, we'd mended our fences until she offended me again and I once more decided to have nothing more to do with her, so simply acted as though she didn't exist.  I continued my established daily routine of a few years, posting work to London in late afternoon and then stopping off at the foodcourt in the town's main shopping centre for a cup of tea, sometimes a meal, and a read of my newspaper.  I started to notice I was getting dirty looks from some people and was stunned to eventually learn she was insinuating that I was stalking her, and using my letter from several weeks before as alleged proof.

Bear in mind she'd made no such suggestions about my letter at the time - the very letter that had led to us being 'reconciled' and getting along amicably until her re-offence.  No, it was weeks (perhaps months) later that she sought to reinterpret my letter as evidence of a 'stalking campaign', even though I was studiously ignoring her very existence at that stage.  Once, as I was sitting having a cuppa in the foodcourt, she walked through, looked around to make sure she was unobserved, scowled at me, and then drew her finger across her throat as if she was slashing it.  But there's more.  A local druggie told me she had approached him and asked how much he'd take for 'sorting me out'.  He's now dead, but at least he was smart enough (barely) not to take her up on her offer.  He'd have come off second best if he had.

Sounds almost unbelievable, doesn't it?  However, I can assure you that it's all 100% factual.  So what was in my letter that could be distorted after the fact to fit her malicious agenda?  Here, let me quote some relevant extracts, which I can do verbatim (Susan's real name aside) as I made a copy before passing it on to her through her daughter.

"...without meaning to be rude to you, Susan is unequivically the only woman on the planet who I care talks to me or not."

"Anyway, Susan suggests that I apologise again, and her wish is my command.  In fact, if she commanded, I would get down on my knees in the foodcourt and kiss your feet."

"However, that said, I shall continue to assume you want nothing to do with me unless you yourself indicate otherwise."

I just this moment dug out my copy of the letter to refer to for this post, but I'd forgotten that I'd previously passed her a brief note (in the company of her boss, who read it first), saying the following: "To be honest, I don't actually give a sh*t if you speak to me again or not (and I'm sure you care even less) but for (boss's name) sake, I'm going to try and accomplish what you wouldn't let me do last time, and apologise (for ignoring her apology).

The smarter among you will have sussed by now that one of the reasons for my letter was because I knew she'd more than likely show it to Susan, who I hoped would be touched by what a lot I thought of her.  How could she not be, given how much I'd be prepared to 'humiliate' myself if she so commanded?  Okay, admittedly I was indulging in hyperbole - kissing anyone's feet was definitely not a statement of intent, nor a declaration of ambition (or even a likely scenario), merely a way of indicating the high regard in which I held Susan.

Like I said, initially the letter mended fences, with no sly insinuations at the time.  No, that came several weeks later, after the fences got broken again.  And that's important to remember.  Eventually, most of the security guards came to their senses and warned this woman about her behaviour and false claims.  One of her staff later apologised to me and admitted he'd been manipulated (his own word) into corroborating her outlandish claims about me.  She never made an 'official' complaint, it was all sly suggestion and sinister insinuation, and the boss of the shopping centre later told me she had done this sort of thing before.

There's so much more I could tell, and maybe I will at a later date, but for the moment, suffice to say I eventually had to go to the police about her, and I got a lawyer's letter sent to her, saying that unless she desisted from her false claims, I would pursue legal redress with the full rigour of the law.  It's important for me to emphasise that she never thought she was being stalked for one second, it was simply a malicious, spiteful lie designed to create trouble for me.  And it did.  For example, fighting off three guys who attacked me in the food court on a day when the security cameras were turned off due to being repaired or replaced.  Now I wonder who could've tipped them off about that?

However, at the end of the day I was vindicated and I derive a certain degree of satisfaction from that, though I'd prefer to have avoided the whole situation altogether.  She was exposed as a bit of a nutter who enjoyed playing the victim, and she later advised one of her young staff who claimed a boy who fancied her was stalking her, not to say that as it could rebound on the girl as it had on her.  (She told this to someone who worked nearby, who told me.)  I suspect she still portrays herself as a victim to a certain extent, though she'll be careful who she does it with.  Rest assured, if I ever hear even a whisper of her repeating her false and discredited claims about me, I'll be suing her for defamation of character.

So, Crivvies, anything like that ever happen to you, and if so, how did you deal with it?  Reveal all in the comments section - if you're brave enough.

"HELL HATH NO FURY..." (Part One)


The true tale I'm about to accurately relate occurred nearly 30 years ago (28 to be precise), yet it still has ramifications on my life to this day.  Perhaps it's one I should keep to myself as even to be thought of in connection to such a topic is embarrassing, but I believe in being honest and I need to mine my own life experiences from time-to-time in order to have something approaching interesting to write about on Crivens.

So here's a question for you all.  Do you know the most effective way to make a woman hate you?  It's to ignore her and refuse to have anything to do with her.  That seems to annoy the hell out of a certain kind of woman and in some cases provoke them into seeking revenge by any means posssible, even if it means telling the most outrageous lies in their desire to get even.

I once knew such a woman, who worked for a local businessman who I considered a friend.  Turns out he wasn't.  I'll try and give you the 'Reader's Digest' version or we'll be here all week, but I fell out with her after she had offended me on a couple of occasions.  I should perhaps stress at this point that she was what I considered a deeply unattractive woman with a horrible personality, and I strongly suspect she was mentally disturbed.  Never at any point did I have designs on her as she wasn't the kind of woman I'd ever have been interested in.

I used to do drawings and posters for her boss, usually in exchange for little more than a cup of tea or a plate of lasagne from a food outlet in the local shopping centre.  Hey, I was self-employed at the time and doing all right so it wasn't as if I needed any extra money.  Her boss usually gave me a lift home every night in his Merc, I assume due to the fact that he saw me as useful to have around.  He also occasionally cashed cheques for me as he seemed fascinated with the Marvel UK logo on some of them and appeared pleased to be 'associated' with the brand.

Anyway, to speed things along a bit, after I fell out with his employee, she pulled in behind his car one night (blocking its exit from the carpark), opened the passenger door and gave a fulsome (if insincere) apology for offending me.  I have absolutely no doubt her boss had instructed her to do so, lest he be deprived of a source of posters and art for his various food outlet businesses.  I was still too angry to speak to her and simply ignored her, leading her to storm off saying "Huh, and they say women are huffy!"

I explained to her boss that I wasn't ready to 'forgive' her yet, and he nodded and said "Try and get along with her for my sake."  Then he ran me home.  Later, I felt a bit bad and petty about ignoring her apology and decided to repair bridges, so the next time I saw her, I said hello and she ignored me.  No skin off my nose, to be honest, because I didn't much like her.  I mentioned to her boss that my olive branch had been rejected and he again requested I try and 'get on with her'.

This is where I introduce 'Susan' into the tale.  Susan isn't her real name, but I want to spare her any embarrassment should she ever chance upon this post.  Susan worked for the same boss as the other woman and I thought very highly of her and would've done just about anything she asked.  She enquired of me one day whether I was speaking with her fellow employee yet and I explained I'd tried but been rebuffed.  "Maybe you should try again" was all she said.  Doubtless her boss, knowing of my regard for her, had suggested she speak to me on the matter. 

Now, I'd have done anything to please Susan and make her think kindly of me, so I resolved to put things right with the other woman and repair the situation.  I didn't really want to talk to her so I wrote her a letter which did the trick.  She showed it off to people, including Susan (as I'd suspected she would), and our acquaintanceship was soon once again on an even keel.  Her boss was happy, Susan was happy, and I was - well, at least satisfied with having 'done the right thing'.

Things went swimmingly for a few weeks until the woman was once more rude to me, causing me to fall out with her again.  I informed her boss that was it, that I had bent over backwards to accommodate her, but it was the last straw and I wouldn't be talking to her ever again.

Guess what happened then.  That's a (shocking) tale for next time, and you'll be astounded at the lengths some people will go to in order to 'get even'.  Look out for part two - coming soon. 

Sunday, 12 July 2026

DID BILL FINGER 'CREATE' THOR...? WHAT SAYEST THOU?

Copyright DC COMICS

So who created ThorStan Lee, Larry Lieber, or Jack Kirby?  Maybe none of them, as Bill Finger seemingly came up with nearly all the concepts of Marvel's Thor in 1959, in Batman #127.  For instance, Thor's hammer always returns to him after it's thrown; Thor, in reality, is a puny, skinny guy who'd probably have to run around in the shower to get wet; and when his human identity touches the hammer, he transforms into Thor.  Coincidence?  Whoever was responsible for the Marvel incarnation, perhaps Lee, Lieber, and Kirby were subliminally influenced by this tale or simply unashamedly appropriated its concepts for their own use.

What do you think, Crivvies?  Which of the three Marvel luminaries do you think 'ripped off' DC and claimed the idea as their own?  Comments welcome, as always.  And if you'd like to read this tale for yourselves, the facsimile edition is available now from all good comics shops!

This MAN Has A POWERFUL WEAPON! (Bragging Again, Robson?)


Another recent acquisition to join the ranks of Crivens Collectables is this great version of Scaramanga's Golden Gun.  I suspect it's a tad larger than the actual movie prop, but that only makes it more visible from across the room.  Nice, eh?  Ready or not, 007, here I come!  (These are the seller's pictures 'cos I'm too tired to take some myself.  Maybe later.)

Saturday, 11 July 2026

WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?


Copyright BBC TV and the Estate of TERRY NATION

Remember The Daleks' hoverbout from TV Century 21 and Dalek Annuals?  The Dalek seen above, being a 'modern' one, doesn't need such a craft, as the tinpot tyrants are able to fly under their own steam nowadays, so just imagine the hoverbouts are for longer journeys to conserve power, which is how I regard them.  I'll have to keep an eye out for a 'classic' Dalek to replace the 'new' one, if I don't already have one somewhere - I forget whether I do or not.  (Well, actually, I do have one, but it's holding a 'brain' or something, which isn't detachable.)

Anyway, thought some of you might like to see one of my recent acquisitions, seeing as how it's a physical manifestation of an iconic piece of comic strip Dalek equipment from the swinging 1960s.  Like I said at the start of this post - do you remember them?  (These are the seller's pictures - I'll add my own when I get a spare moment to snap some.)

(And what's happened to commenter CJ?  On holiday, in hospital, joined a monastery?  CJ, where are you?  Out gallivanting with Scooby Doo?)


Tuesday, 7 July 2026

DREAM A LITTLE DREAM OF ME - The MAMAS And The PAPAS...

I'M ALL ALONE AGAIN - DON SPENCER...



Relax, Crivs, I'm perfectly fine (in response to
a comment), I'm just playing some of my fave songs.
I've liked this one since childhood, the 'B' side of the
Fireball XL5 theme.  Not about to throw myself
off a bridge anytime soon (or ever, in fact).

AUTUMN LEAVES - NAT 'KING' COLE...


Monday, 29 June 2026

NOT FOR THE FAINT-HEARTED... (Updated)


Back in March, I told you about the Care Home my 104 year-old mother (who has Alzheimer's and cancer) has the misfortune to reside in.  The place is owned by a company called Enhance and currently goes under the name of Meadowbrook.  Unfortunately, my mother can barely walk and has trouble when she visits the toilet, sometimes leaving the seat covered in excrement.  The manageress seems to think that checking the cleanliness of the toilet every four or five hours (if they actually do) is sufficient, even though it's the work of seconds to open the door of her en suite facilities and check the condition of the seat.

Sometimes when I visit, the seat is filthy and even when I alert staff and they 'clean' it, it's still left in an unsatisfactory condition, sometimes until my next visit.  I always take photographs and it's obvious when photos between visits are compared, the excrement is the same from last time.  Anyway, let's cut to the chase.  Take a look at the above photo from some months back - would you say this is an acceptable standard of cleanliness?  Also, bear in mind that if the seat is dirty, the excrement is more than likely to be on my mother's skin as well, but management and staff don't appear to be unduly concerned with the situation.

Below are two photos from my Saturday visit.  My mother obviously had another 'accident' (at some stage through the week) and though the seat has been wiped, it's still dirty.  Don't know about you, but I think my mother deserves better.  Anyone with media connections reading this?  Or if you know someone connected to the media, perhaps you'd be so good as to direct them to this post.  I'll be contacting the media anyway as this place deserves to be named-and-shamed on a wider level, but any shortcuts will be most welcome.  As will your comments.



******

Update: The previous two photos were taken on the 27th.  Copies of them were sent to the Care Home manageress.  Now take a look at the two photos below, taken on the 30th.  The marks on the seat are practically identical, indicating the seat hasn't been cleaned (or cleaned properly) in three days.  However, as my mother is currently bedbound, she needs staff to take her to her en suite toilet and back several times, so you'd think they would have noticed the seat was dirty over a period of three days.  They certainly should have.  I got a staff member to clean it while I was there, but there's no way it should've been left in that condition, especially as it could have been like that for days before I first noticed it.


Sunday, 28 June 2026

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION ON BLOGGING 'BEGGARS'...?

Here's a question for you, Crivvies.  I see on some blogs a 'donate' button so readers can make a financial contribution if they enjoy what they read.  Anyone else think this is a bit forward?  I read some blogs simply because they're there, though I probably wouldn't miss them if they weren't, but I'd never read them if I had to pay for the 'privilege'.  Of course, nobody's obliged to give money nor pay any specific amount, but some of those bloggers aren't exactly financially impoverished, so I think it's a bit cheeky to invite readers to donate to the cost of a blog's upkeep.  (Not all those bloggers are on Blogger, but on some different platform.)

Perhaps they feel they're enlightening the Internet with their 'words of wisdom', and their efforts in maintaining a blog should be rewarded, but my philosophy is "B*ll*cks to that!"  I do Crivens because I enjoy doing so (though I've got less energy and stamina to devote to it these days), but I'd never think of asking anyone to contribute money to what is essentially a 'hobby'.  That's because I don't consider anything I write as something that needs to be read and I can cease publishing any new posts should the 'glamour' of sharing my thoughts and/or goodies with fellow bloggers diminish past a certain point and it becomes more bother than it's worth.

The only thing I invite Crivs to contribute is a comment, so feel free to do so on this occasion.  How do the rest of you regard the 'donate' button?  It's not mandatory, but don't you think it's presumptuous, as though the host thinks what he writes deserves financial support - even only if you want to?  Is it any different to asking a passerby for a few quid for a cup of tea?  Yeah, they can give you it or not, but it's surely nothing more than begging, isn't it?  So tell me, are there any blogs you visit you'd be prepared to donate to?  Reveal all in our comments section - but only if you want to.  (And do you ever feel guilty about not making a donation?)

Friday, 26 June 2026

BOHEMIAN (RHAPSODY) CATSODY - These MOGGIES Have It Covered...


Saw this on another blog a little while back
and thought you Crivs might enjoy seeing it too,
so pin back your lug'oles and give it a listen.

Wednesday, 24 June 2026

RECENT DC And MARVEL FACSIMILE EDITIONS For COMIC FANS...

Copyright DC COMICS and MARVEL COMICS respectively.  Incidentally, given that
Ra's al Ghul is holding Bats' costume, the caped crusader's legs should be flesh coloured

Here's a quality quartet of Facsimile Editions from DC and Marvel.  Although the Marvel issues are excellent, the DC ones just steal the Blue Peter Badge as they're more like the original printings than the Marvel ones.  This is due to the paper DC use and their placement of the barcode box on the back cover instead of the front.  Not got 'em yet?  Don't wait too long, effendis - you wouldn't want to miss these beauties.



The RETURN Of Major MATT MASON... (Updated)



Back in 2022, the San Diego Comic Con had an exclusive set of new versions of a trio of classic characters on sale.  These were Big Jim, Pulsar, and Major Matt Mason by Mattel Creations. (Copyrighted 2020.)  Interestingly, some years before, I'd suggested in a comment somewhere on the blog it'd be a good idea for Mattel to produce an updated version of the character.  I was thinking of one that looked more like the original, but with a different type of articulation than wire within rubber.  Anyway, a few years back Major Matt made what was probably a brief and limited return, which I learned about only recently.  I got the set of three figures from eBay, though it was really only Matt I wanted, but I'll make the other two welcome as well.  Some years ago (around 15 or so) there was talk of a big-budget movie (possibly CGI) of the Major starring Tom Hanks, but for some reason or other it never came to pass.

Were you a fan of the original Major Matt Mason?  Tell your fellow Crivs all about your playtime past with Mattel's Man In Space in the comments section.  However, first check out the TV ad, below, from the dim and distant days of the '60s.


******

Update 25th June: Items arrived today and I was surprised to see that the figures are only around four-and-a-half inches tall, nearly an inch-and-a-half smaller than the original Mayor Matt Mason and even smaller compared to Big Jim and Pulsar, which I think were roughly around 12 inches in height.  Still, at least the trio got a chance to 'live' again in this modern age.  (They might've given Matt a space-helmet though.)

Monday, 15 June 2026

BABE Of The DAY - WONDER WOMAN...



Here's a nice pic of Wonder Woman
for all you Crivs to salivate over.  Aside from
Denny O'Neil's run on the character, I wasn't
much of a fan of comicdom's Princess Diana,
though I appreciated the 'good girl art' whenever
it appeared in her mag.  What about the rest
of you - did/does she ring your bell?

Sunday, 14 June 2026

The DALEKS - MONEY In The BANK... (Updated)


It was Friday 6th October 1972 and I was in Hamilton with my father as I was off school that day because I was ill.  Too ill for school, but obviously not too ill to go to Hamilton.  (I'm talking about the Scottish town, not the musical, which didn't exist then.)  On that day I bought two items; a second copy of The Mighty World Of Marvel #1, and The Fantastic Four #126 - both from the same newsagent's shop.  It was nearly three items, but I decided against buying the third because it wasn't the finest example of its kind.

I saw it through the window of a shop similar in appearance to The Tinkerer's repair shop in The Amazing Spider-Man #2.  The premises were still there when I was last in Hamilton a few short years back, though the shop itself wasn't and the building was empty if I recall correctly.  And what was the item?  'Twas a Cowan de Groot Dalek Money Box (said box on the box, though I'd have called it a bank), and it wasn't what could be described as a totally accurate representation of Dr. Who's greatest enemy.

This was a toy from the 1960s, so in 1972 it was clearly old unsold stock and I was unaware of what a collectors' item it would become if it wasn't already, so I therefore decided to pass on it.  It was obviously patterned after the Marx Dalek, and I've seen a plate with an illustration of the same design, so maybe that had an influence also.  (I'm not sure which went on sale first, the plate or the bank, but either way, they were both released sometime in 1965.)

Anyway, I didn't buy it, but over the years/decades, I grew to regret that decision as the toy bank always reminded me of that day out with my father and what I believe was my first visit to Hamilton.  Bet you know where this is going, eh?  I recently bid on a boxed example in an eBay auction and guess what?  I won!  I should receive it tomorrow, but rather than wait to take my own photos, I thought I'd just show you some of the selller's and save time.  Yes, it's a weird shape, but it's good to finally own something I should've bought 54 years ago.

I've owned replacements for MWOM #1 and FF #126 for decades now, so when tomorrow comes, it'll give me an immense sense of satisfaction to finally add the Dalek bank to what should've been its two companions, back when I was a schoolboy on a jaunt to a neighbouring town all those years ago.  Any of you ever own this bank, Crivs?  If so, what did you think of it, and what does your grown-up self think of it now?

******

And in case you were wondering what the plate looked like, that's it below.


******

Update: The little chap arrived today so below is a couple of pics of him on my dining-room table.  The seller had mentioned he'd never removed the head because it was stiff and he didn't want to risk breaking it, but a little touch of WD-40 soon fixed that.  Also, in the seller's photos above, the appendages are not fitted all the way in, which leads me to believe the bank has never been used.  I ever-so-slightly 'loosened' the holes with a small fine circular file (don't panic, no damage) and now the eyestalk, sucker arm, and gun all fit perfectly.  Didn't I do well?  (There was a risk of the plastic around the holes splitting if I'd tried forcing them in.)  The Dalek's angular 'slant' to its body is the wrong way round in relation to the head, and though it's the same size as the small Marx friction-drive toy, the eye orb, blue base and inner head indicate that it was the large 'Bump 'n' Go' it was modelled after (approximately).


Saturday, 13 June 2026

RED Into GOLD - 4 Into 5...



As most (if not all) of you already know by now, Corgi's 261 Aston Martin D.B.5 was created from an amended mould of an existing D.B.4 (218) in order to meet the Christmas market of 1965.  Apparently it was quicker to customise an existing mould than create an entirely new one from scratch, and three designers/engineers were tasked with adding the car's three working features.  Although the Bond version says D.B.5 on the base, the tail lights give the game away, but at least Corgi changed the headlights into D.B.5 ones.


Anyway, I decided I'd like to own the earlier version so bought one on eBay.  I also purchased a repro box on the same day (from a different seller) and both items turned up together.  The D.B.4 is 'playworn', but I'll give it a colour touch-up in places to improve its cosmetic appearance.  So there you are, Crivs - the source of  one of the most iconic diecast toy cars of the '60s.  And as you can see on the box, the car has an opening bonnet.  Nice, eh?



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...