![]() |
| Copyright DC COMICS |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
![]() |
| Copyright DC COMICS |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
As I dozed fitfully in my scratcher in the early hours of this morning, a rather bizarre notion occurred to me, which many of you might prefer not to consider. However, I'll lay out my stall anyway, and perhaps some of you may be intrigued (and bold) enough to ponder the proposition, which is this. Ready?
Imagine that magic exists, and that a mystical being were to present itself to you with the following offer: you could have one wish, and that wish would be you could bring back to this plane of existence a departed relative, friend, or lover. Only one, mind, and it wouldn't be in a 'monkey's paw'-type way, with a resucitated mouldering corpse chapping your front door.
No, it would be the person of your choice returned to life, with all the vim, vigour, and vitality of when they were at their best; and it would actually be that person, not a clone, simulacrum, android, or imitation of any kind, but the 'real deal' just as you'd known them in life. (We're talking magic, remember.)
So here's the inevitable question you knew was coming. Who would you choose for a second chance at life? Parent, sibling, spouse, pet, favourite relative (aunt, uncle, etc.), or a famous figure from history? Yeah, I know that kind of puts you on the spot, but have a think about it, then say who you'd choose - and why!
That should clear any cobwebs from your brain, as you're placed in the unenviable position of deciding who among your departed friends or relations you'd like to see again, out of every expired person you've ever known. I suppose what I'm asking is who do you miss the most? The comments section awaits.
![]() |
| Copyright relevant owner |
![]() |
| Copyright relevant owner |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
To be honest, I wasn't much impressed by The Superhero Women when I thumbed through it in a shop in Glasgow sometime back in 1977, which is why I didn't buy it. Strange, though, as the John Romita Snr. cover should have swung it for me, especially as it featured Susan Storm (The Invisible Girl) in all her Magnificent Marvel Maidenhood, and you all know by now how much I fancied her. In seeming contradiction to that sentiment, however, I confess I've seen sexier representations of Susie (wasn't too keen on her hairstyle here), but the other gals should've swayed me as I was a fickle little fecker when it came to comicbook cuties.
So, like I said, I didn't purchase it on that non-eventful day. Also, as Stan Lee himself says in one of the tale's intros, it isn't really an 'origins' book on account of only around two (at a quick count) of the 11 tales actually qualifying as such, the others being 'generic' adventure stories of the featured characters. Over the years, though, I began to regret my downbeat decision back then as it meant I was one book short in the series, so I recently took the plunge in rectifying the situation and purchased a decent condition copy via eBay, which arrived at Castel Crivens this morning. This book can be quite costly, but I managed to secure one at a reasonable price.
So it only took 49 years to get my grubby mitts on the buggah, but now that I've got it, it somehow feels as though I've returned to 1977 for a spell, or brought part of 1977 into the present, which is more-or-less the same thing, wouldn't you say? Regardless, any cavortin' Crivvies ever buy this book at the time (or later), and if so, what did you think of it? Also, out of the seven superhero females featured here, which one is your favourite? Comments encouraged.
![]() |
| Copyright DC COMICS |
![]() |
| All images copyright relevant and respective owners |
![]() |
| The issue used, copyright MARVEL COMICS |
Many moons ago, I bought via auction a first edition softcover of Origins Of Marvel Comics and noticed that its three Doctor Strange strips weren't reprinted in their correct sequential order. His origin story was presented before his debut story, which followed the intro to the subsequent story, which didn't appear until after the Epilogue instead of before. In short, someone royally screwed up. The proper sequence of strips and intros was corrected for the second printing onwards, so I guess that was the one I had as I don't recall ever noticing anything untoward about the Doctor Strange section of the book at the time.
For some reason, I didn't keep my earliest copies (gave them to friends perhaps), but bought a fourth edition from a bookshop in Glasgow circa the late '70s, which is the one that Stan Lee autographed for me (along with a passel of other books) when I met him in 1991. He was 69 at the time (coming up for 70), which scares the hell out of me as that means he was only around a couple of years older than I am now. (Where did my life go?!) However, there was another error in the 1974 incarnation of Origins, which I just learned about after buying the 50th Anniversary deluxe edition only recently, and it's as follows.
In the Spidey section, the back-up, more contemporary strip, was supposed to be an Electro story, but one featuring The Shocker was used instead. The title was "Rocked By The Shocker!", so presumably someone thought this was the intended Electro tale and this is the one that was published. When the mistake was discovered (after printing), was the wrong tale removed for future editions and the correct one substituted? No, the text of Stan's intro to the tale was rewritten (presumably by Stan) and the original intended strip appeared in a later Spidey reprint book in the Fireside series, devoted to individual heroes.
The 50th Anniversary deluxe edition corrects the running order of the Doctor Strange stories (mentioning it in the indicia), but not the introductory exposition to the Spidey story, retaining the reference to the non-utilised strip. This decision confused me, as I thought I'd have noticed this glaring error before now, having re-read my '70s edition several times over the years, but when I checked, I saw that the text had been rewritten for the second edition and all subsequent ones. Cop a gander at what the first printing said, just in case there are any Marvel malcontents or incredulous Crivvies out there who steadfastly refuse to believe me...
In the episode that follows, you'll meet his gorgeous, star-crossed girlfriend, Gwendolyn, as well as the bolt-hurling Electro---just one of the countless colorful supervillains our dauntless hero dares defy. You'll also see the now-classic "Spidey in the Laundromat" episode, as well as some evidence of Marvel's typical nontoken treatment of its many black characters.
The amended version reads...
In the episode that follows, you'll meet his gorgeous, star-crossed girlfriend, Gwendolyn, as well as the anti-social Shocker---just one of the countless colorful supervillains our dauntless hero dares defy. You'll also see the now classic "Jameson Loses His Cool" episode, as well as some evidence of Marvel's typically untypical exotically exaggerated action scenes.
Like I say, I was previously unaware of this change until recently, which just goes to show you're never too old to learn something new.
![]() |
| The issue that should've been used |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
I thought perhaps it would use new proofs of these classic stories, but no - they're exactly as they first appeared in OOMC five decades ago. Closely examining the pages, I suspect they've either been scanned or photographed from an actual 1974 edition, but it's been done to such a high standard it's hard to be certain. All I know is that any obvious 'reconstruction' and retouches in the original version are also present here, but instead of being a drawback, it simply adds to the book's authenticity.
It's available on eBay (and perhaps Amazon - dunno, I haven't checked), so if you haven't already bought this valiant (and surprisingly heavy) volume, track one down right away. I'd be surprised - shocked - amazed if you were disappointed. The dustjacket is by Alex Ross, and on the boards is the original cover by John Romita Snr. I've only had a cursory browse through this terrific tome so far, but its magical spell is irresistable, as it took me right back to the sizzlin' '70s in a heartbeat.
I'm not suggesting, I'm not hinting, I'm not asking you to consider it; I'm telling you - buy this book now! (And your world will never again be the same.) Incidentally, it's the deluxe hardback edition I purchased, but softcover versions with no bonuses (same as the' 74 printing) are also available. Excelsior!
![]() |
| Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
Saturday 30th September 1972 was an eventful day for British fans of Marvel Comics, as that was the day The Mighty World Of Marvel - or MWOM - was launched. A weekly comic with a mixture of b&w, full colour and spot colour pages (the full colour pages increased to 8 with # 5), the first 30 or so issues had a magical quality that later issues couldn't quite match - mainly due to there being something extra-special about those early adventure strips.
I was already familiar with the stories from the days of the '60s Odhams Power Comics, but they'd all been reprinted in b&w and in different dimensions to their original US presentations, so to see the tales closer to how they'd originally appeared was a treat to the 14-year-old me, and I'm sure other kids of a similar age felt the same. It's a safe bet that many of today's Merry Marvel Maniacs became so with the inaugral issue of this gaily-coloured comic.
Anyway, today is 54 years since Marvel UK burst onto the scene, so what follows is a selection of images from that classic 1st issue from all those years ago. Sure, you've seen 'em all before on Crivens, but I couldn't let the big day pass without celebrating. So feel free to wax lyrical in the comments section if you were around back then - or even if you weren't.
![]() |
| Yer actual unfolded poster, not an ad image |
![]() |
| Copyright DC COMICS |