Sunday, 29 March 2026

PART TWO Of MARVEL'S CONAN SAGA COVER GALLERY...

Copyright MARVEL COMICS and CPI


Okay, peeps, I've kept you in suspenders long enough, so here's the second instalment of covers from Conan Saga, a reprint title featuring previously published b&w tales from Savage Sword Of Conan monthly.  I remember having some covers from the UK edition of SSOC on my room wall back in the '70s, so contrary to what I believed, I couldn't have given away all the issues I had to a friend, unless he didn't mind having them in a cannibalised condition.  However, that's neither here nor there, so feast your eyes on another 16 painted images and wish that you could pull some of those gorgeous burds that always seemed to be clinging to Conan's leg (or close by).  Sweaty men seem to be irresistible to stunning women back in the Hyborian Age, so why's it not like that today?  I'd be fighting them off with a big soft bendy stick if it were.  Feel free to comment.  No, in fact I insist.  And be sure to keep your peepers peeled for Part Three.















Saturday, 28 March 2026

BABE Of The DAY - YVONNE CRAIG...



The lovely Yvonne Craig poses for
our pleasure in a publicity shot as Maude
Waverly in The Man From U.N.C.L.E. TV
show, back in the '60s.  Don't be alarmed by the
gun she's totin' as I happen to know it's only a
water pistol she uses on her flowerbed.  So -
"Come into the garden, Maude."

Friday, 27 March 2026

RECENT ARRIVALS Of FACSIMILE EDITIONS...


Copyright MARVEL COMICS

Not long arrived here at Castel Crivens (though pre-ordered some months back), four great Facsimile Editions - one a doubler - including Silver Surfer #1, and Action Comics #242 & #419, the original of which I bought around 9 months ago.  As well as the normal version of SS #1, I got the variant foil edition, though I'm not sure it will scan properly due to its silvery sheen.  If it's not included in the following images then it clearly didn't.

Glad to see Marvel have gone for the square-binding of the '60s ish, instead of staples, which diminishes the historical integrity of such publications in my opinion.  Hopefully, they'll reissue previous stapled reprints in their original format in the future.  Good to see the foil edition has no barcode box on the front cover, instead being relegated to the back as DC now do with all their facsimiles.  Wish Marvel would adopt the same approach with future standard reissues.

Also, the reproduction of the ads in the DC mags is spot-on, not having the wishy-washy, faded look to them of some previous facsimiles.  Looks like they're finally getting the hang of it.

Anyway, if you don't already have these titanic titles, rush round to your nearest comics shop or get on to eBay and nab 'em for your collection.  Incidentally, if you were thinking of not buying the SS #1 reprint because you already have the Fantasy Masterpieces presentation from the '70s, be aware that this issue had a few pages omitted and isn't complete.  It was edited in such a way as not to be obvious, but I'm sure you'd prefer to own the complete story.

Anyway, feast your eyes on these covers.

Copyright DC COMICS

Copyright DC COMICS

As I suspected, the variant foil cover wouldn't scan properly (just came out black), so I photographed it at an angle so that you could get a better look at it.

Copyright MARVEL COMICS

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

BABE Of The DAY - VERONICA CARLSON...



I've never cared much for the name
Veronica - sounds too much like 'verruca'
to my ears and there's nothing attractive about
one of those.  This little lady, however, is as pretty
as a picture, which is exactly what I'm giving you
as I'm keeping the real gal for myself.  (She
deserves only the best and that's me!)

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

DC SUPER SPECTACULAR LOVE STORIES...


Copyright DC COMICS

The original 1971 publication of the above Replica Edition from 2000 has various asking prices on eBay, from just under £100 all the way up to over £1,500.  Even some of the replicas are pretty heftily priced in my opinion.  However, I got mine for a far more reasonable amount, which didn't even come close to breaking the bank.

What interested me about this mag, which is unashamedly aimed at the girlie market, is the roster of artists whose work it contains.  Are you ready for this?  In either a pencilling or inking capacity, Jay Scott Pike, Bob Oksner, Morris Waldinger, Win Mortimer, Art Saaf, Vince Colletta, John Romita, Tony Abruzzo, Ric Estrada, Wally Wood, Norman Nodel, Mort Drucker, Bob Lander, Mike Sekowsky, and Bernard Sachs.  The stories are written by Robert Kanigher and Jack Miller (one strip in two parts) and do the job, though you won't be on the edge of your seats while reading them.

I learnt about this mag only recently, and it was quite a surprise when I realised the replica itself is 26 years old, and the original a whopping 57 years old.  Some of the strips look as though they've been resized and had panels extended, but it's been done reasonably well, in the main.  Of course, I know all you male Crivs are far too manly to be interested in the subject of soppy romance and (ugh) love, but I thought you might have some wee sisters who might be.  As for myself, I only bought it to use as material for the blog as, like you, I'm also far too manly for such stuff.  (As my close friend and constant companion Cyril will testify.)

Unfortunately, the square-bound spine is just a little too tight to open the mag wide enough to scan the interiors flatly, so you'll just have to take my word in regard to the quality of the art, which ain't half bad in my opinion.  Comments, anyone?

Monday, 23 March 2026

MARVEL'S CONAN SAGA COVER GALLERY...


Conan characters copyright CPI

If events truly occurred as I remember them, I bought the first issue of Conan Saga in Glasgow, maybe in AKA Books & Comics, in 1987.  The mag is cover-dated May, which means it went on sale (in America at least) around February.  If it was an advance copy (one the UK customer paid a little more for), it was likely available in Britain around the same time or thereabouts.  It started with the Barry Smith illustrated tales and worked its way through later adventures by other artists in sequential order.  The mag lasted for 97 issues until 1995, which was a good long run for a reprint publication.  I can only assume it became difficult to get in Scotland as I didn't last the course and gave up after missing a few later issues.

Anyway, there must have been a problem with the trains that day, because I got a bus home, which is unusual for me as I don't like travelling by that mode of transport if I can help it.  As I was sitting leafing through the mag, who should board the vehicle but my ol' night-school chum Hugh, who sat himself beside me and we nattered away throughout the journey.  Regular readers may have read my post entitled 'Hugh And I', in which I mentioned him being sadly and untimely killed by a bus a few years later.  Whenever I look at the BWS cover of the above debut mag, 'tis Hugh that springs to mind.  He was a nice lad, who, ironically, was hit by a bus, and I intend no humour in that remark in the slightest.

I dug my collection of this title out of my cupboard a few months back to check just how many I had, and noticed it petered out around #64, though there were a few missing for some forgotten reason.  I know I didn't give any away so I must've been unable to acquire them at the time.  Problem soon solved  via the auspices of eBay and I now have every issue up to and including the 64th.  Will I ever track down the remaining 33 and complete the collection?  I haven't decided yet, but never say never, Crivs.  Anyway, I've been threatening to do a cover gallery for a while now, so here's the first instalment of four for your perusal.  If you've got a favourite (or favourites), share it with the rest of us in the comments section.

******

Incidentally, I was living in another house when Conan Saga first came out, but we moved back to our previous residence just a few months later.  I tend to associate the mag with that other house, even though I'd only have bought 5 or 6 of them at the very most before returning to my present abode, the rest of them being acquired subsequently.  So I got most of them here, but associate the title with there.  (What am I like?!)  One more thing: The first 9 issues sported all-new covers specially produced by Barry Smith as they contained his Conan tales, though #8 also contains two stories illustrated by John Buscema and Neal Adams respectively.















Thursday, 19 March 2026

RECOMMENDED READING: TWO DC FACSIMILE EDITIONS FOR YOUR COLLECTION...

Copyright DC COMICS

A couple of recent releases, Crivs, that some of you may be interested in.  First up, above, is the Facsimile Edition, of Secret Origins [of] Super Villains, which is one I'm pretty sure I had, as many of the interior pages seem familiar to me, with the exception of the Batman/Red Hood story, which I don't recall from this mag.  I know the story from a Giant Batman issue I bought in Rothesay in 1970, but if I recognised it again in the above mag at the time, I've since forgotten, unusually for me.

Next up, below (yes, I'm aware that's a contradiction-in-terms), is the first ish of the two-part Alan Moore story that brought to a conclusion the Silver and Bronze Age eras of Superman, before John Byrne (and others) launched a new direction for the character, in the wake of Crisis On Infinite Earths that revised the entire history of the DC Universe.  I still have my original issues, and it's quite a jolt to realise they're now 40 years old.  Rush out and buy these great facsimiles today. 

Sunday, 15 March 2026

CARE HOMES. FORGET THE MYTH - CARERS ARE NO ANGELS...

Care Homes.  The name is a bit of a misnomer, unless it's referring to the chief 'care' of such places, which is making money.  Let me tell you a little about Care Homes, of which I have experience on account of my mother being in one for four years on the 25th of this month.  She's 103 (104 in May), has Alzheimer's and cancer, and she's been in it since 2022 and in all that time it's been nothing but a continual stream of complaints from me about the way in which she's 'looked after'.  I'm more or less satisfied with the way she's fed and watered in their 'one-size-fits-all' standard of care, but when it comes to specific requirements relating to my mother's particular condition, they don't have a scooby - or if they do, they ignore it. 

When I visit, the floor is very often filthy as are the two tables in her room, which the night-shift staff seem unwilling or incapable of wiping unless I ask them, obviously preferring to leave such tasks to the cleaners in the morning.  My mother has two hearing aids, which often are left with dead or dying batteries in them, leaving her unable to hear.  Sometimes they have no batteries at all, and when I ask staff to fit new ones, the response is "I don't know where they're kept" or on a few occasions "I don't know how to fit them"  The last time I was told this, I asked the woman how long she'd worked in the place and was told "Four years".  Simply staggering.

Also, on the back of the battery pack, it says to wait for 60 seconds after removing the orange stickers before inserting, but the staff don't usually bother waiting, meaning the new batteries aren't 100% effective.  They also don't press the reset button on the hearing aids after inserting batteries, which, again, means they remain ineffective.  I wouldn't trust most of these people to look after a goldfish, never mind a human being.  They're supposed to check my mother's hearing aids every few hours, and though they mark down that they have, they clearly haven't bothered.  Only recently, I was told that new batteries had been inserted earlier in the morning, but my mother didn't even know when I was speaking to her.  When I checked her two hearing aids, one had a battery and the other didn't.  So much for new batteries being fitted that morning.

Due to my mother's Alzheimer's, I had asked for her hearing aids and their receptacles to be stored in the reception office at bedtime, to prevent her putting them in before visiting the toilet through the small hours and then forgetting to remove them when she returned to bed.  She also has tinnitus, meaning she often hears noises in her inner ear canal which she thinks are 'exterior' noises, resulting in her fitting her hearing aids in the small hours of the morning to see if she can identify their source.  She fits them to go to the en suite toilet, then forgets to take them out when she returns to bed, which has resulted in them getting broken on several occasions as she's wearing them while asleep.  Due to her befuddled state, she sometimes puts her dentures in the hearing aid receptacles, which makes a helluva mess.

Because of these issues, I asked for her hearing aids and receptacles not to be kept in her room through the night as she didn't need them at 2 a.m. (or whatever) to go to the toilet, and this was agreed upon by management.  Staff, however, had a different idea, and despite assuring me several times that this was being followed, weren't actually doing so, as I found out one night when a member of staff inadvertently let slip that the items were left in her room overnight.

I decided to check, so I dropped in at 1 a.m. one morning to find my mother fully dressed and fast asleep, slumped in her armchair in front of the TV, which along with her room light was still on.  1 a.m. - terrible.  When I questioned staff as to why my mother wasn't in bed, one of them produced what looked like an envelope, on the back of which was written a list of names and room numbers.  Every name had 'assist' written next to it, with the exception of my mother's, which said 'leave'.  This was despite me telling staff and management (from day one) that my mother's bedtime was 10 p.m.  However, sometimes my mother retired to her bed early, and some clueless 'senior carer' took it upon herself to decide that if my mother could put herself to bed at 7 or 8 p.m., she was likewise capable of going to bed at 10 without assistance.

Trouble with that was my mother would sit up watching TV until she fell asleep in her chair, and because she wasn't being checked, that could be in the wee small hours.  Trusting anyone with Alzheimer's to look after themselves properly by going to bed at a reasonable and regular time is ridiculous - they're in a care home because they can't be relied on to look after themselves, yet the numpties in my mother's place apparently think otherwise.  Often when I visited, my mother had been left in bed most or all of the day and when I enquired as to why, I was told "because she wanted a lie in".  Well, of course she did, being knackered as she wasn't helped to bed at 10 p.m., which is when I said from day one was my mother's bedtime.  But nah, why listen to the person who looked after her by himself for years, eh, and who knows what's best for her based on personal experience?

They just seemed incapable of understanding that her limbs and mind would further atrophy if she was left in bed for hours, and sometimes she would just stare at the ceiling when I visited as her mind had essentially closed down through lack of any kind of physical and mental stimulation.  They don't care, however, as all they're really interested in is their cigarette breaks and doing as little as they can get away with.  Recently, over the course of at least a week, the floor in my mother's room hadn't been swept and the same particles of dirt and 'debris' were still in place after several visits.  I took photos, however, and if I have to take the Care Home to court, I have dozens, if not hundreds of photos showing the dirty and untidy state of her room, including excrement on her toilet seat, which wasn't cleaned properly even after me bringing it to their attention.  What's that?  It's a dirty job and they don't get paid much?  Tough!  They shouldn't do it then.  Hell, what am I saying?  They don't.

I'm not saying that all staff are the same, some are quite pleasant, but far too many just don't appear to have a scooby when it comes to the quality of care in regard to a nearly 104 year old woman with Alzheimer's and cancer.  In the interests of fairness, the current manageress (she's had two predecessors) is trying to solve the issues, but her staff simply don't seem to listen to her.  They treat the place like their private fiefdom and run it for their own convenience rather than that of the residents.  It's as though it's staffed by a bunch of amateurs, not properly-trained professionals.  It now has new owners, yet I've still to see any consistent improvement.  Around three years ago, my local newspaper ran a story about my unhappiness with the place, but the Care Home didn't respond.  

No photos this time as there are simply too many to choose from, but in the next instalment there will be horror stories aplenty and I'll publish names and photographs of some of the culprits.  Unless, that is, after four years of this fiasco, they can get their act together and treat my mother with the dignity she deserves.  Up to them.  Non-anonymous comments welcome.

Wednesday, 11 March 2026

CAN YOU SPOT The DIFFERENCE Between SUPER SPECTACULAR #6 ('71) And Its REPLICA EDITION ('04)...? (Updated - See Foot Of Post)

Copyright DC COMICS

If you're a comics-buying Brit of a similar vintage to myself, you know US comics used to come to the UK as ballast in ships.  This meant it was months, maybe even years after they were published in the States, before they appeared on our newsagents' spinner-racks, though occasionally some of them were available on our shores not too far removed from their US point of sale.  'Twas all down to random chance and a bit of good luck, basically.

I recall buying a few US mags back in the '60s, which I later bought again in the '70s, in brand-new condition and for their original price - or whatever the current equivalent was.  Seaside resorts like Largs and Blackpool were particularly good for finding pristine, inexpensive US comics, and I acquired several Kirby FFs years after he'd departed Marvel for DC, as well as some Buscema Silver Surfers.  What are the chances of that happening today, eh?

Forgive the preamble, but I wanted to set the scene for what I'm about to say next.  Although DC Super Spectacular #6 was published in 1971, I never saw it in my local shops 'til around '73, maybe even '74, whereupon I swiftly bought it.  I no longer remember how long I had it for, but I don't think it would've been years, probably no more than a few months at the most.  I was more of a comics buyer in those days, as opposed to a collector.

Anyway, in 2004, DC Comics released a replica edition of the mag, which I bought at the time (and still have), though there was something about the wrap-around cover that didn't look quite right to me.  The original covers had been drawn by Neal Adams (pencils) and Dick Giordano (inks), but there was something subtly different about the replica edition.  Upon investigation (reading the indicia), I discovered the cover was a re-creation by Dick Giordano on his own.

I'd have thought Giordano, as the original inker, could've managed to re-create a more faithful replica of the covers, but seemingly not.  Did he draw it from scratch, trace it, use a projector, or utilise the 'graph' method?  I don't know, so if anyone does, please enlighten your fellow Crivvies, if you'd be so good.  Anyway, I recently acquired a replacement for my long-gone original, which I wanted simply because I once had it and wanted to own it again.  That's nostalgia for you.

So here are both versions for you to compare.  Black Canary looks as though she's got a slight squint in the replica and there are other faces which don't quite match their original incarnations.  Is this the sort of thing that'd bother you, Crivs, or do you regard such things as inconsequential?  Would you even have noticed the differences had I not drawn your attention to them?  Feel free to mock my anally-retentive memory (when it works properly) in the comments section.


Below, side-by-side, are all four cover images for easier comparison.  No, don't thank me, it's all part of the free service - though donations will be gratefully appreciated.  (Don't all rush at once.)



And thanks to Matt for pointing out in the comments section that the front cover of SS #6 was obviously inspired by and based on All Star Comics #16, below.  (The back cover was an ad.)



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...