A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial content! With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, rueful reflections, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, poignant ponderings & yearnings for yesteryear! (To say nothing of a few profound perplexities & puzzling paradoxes thrown in for good measure.) Plus a bevy of beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes!
Monday 20 May 2024
BASIL BRUSH AS A BABY...
Saturday 18 May 2024
COMIC CONTRIBUTORS WHOSE WORK YOU'D HAVE LIKED TO SEE ON THE COMICS OF YOUR YOUTH...
Copyright MARVEL COMICS |
Here's a quick question for you, Crivvies. Which comicbook would you've liked to see 'touched' by a particular artist (penciller or inker), who didn't work on that comicbook? For instance, much as I like Vince Colletta's inking of Jack Kirby's pencils on Thor, I'd have loved to see what John Severin's inking would've done to the strip. I'd also have loved to see Wally Wood's inks on Kirby's FF. I'm not just talking about the odd assignment here and there, I mean as regular contributors to those particular mags. Same goes for pencillers - which comics would you've liked to see drawn by which artists? Tell all in the comments section.
Thursday 16 May 2024
BATMAN LIMITED COLLECTORS' EDITION...
Wednesday 15 May 2024
The GHOST Who 'TALKS'... (Updated)
Actual drawing size 57mm high |
I've just spent the last 20 minutes or so 'conversing' with an old friend. He died 11 years ago (which I only found out about in September of last year), but between the end of 1977 and 1980, we kept in touch by letter after he joined the Navy. So did I employ a happy medium? (Guffaw!) No, I recently rediscovered his letters in a box and had a read through them, and it was good to 'reconnect' with the friend I'd liked and found amusing, before he became almost another person (at least in regard to me) and I eventually cut all ties with him. (Regular readers will perhaps remember the events from previous posts.)
As I read his letters and cards, his 'voice' ran through them, and it was as if time had rolled back and his missives were recent communications, not nearly 50 years old. To read references that only I would know was a poignant reminder of our youth, and I found myself dwelling on events and circumstances that I hadn't thought of in a long time.
For example, he mentions 'cows passing over' (raining) when he was on a training exercise, and my mind returned to the time a passing car drove through a muddy puddle and thoroughly drenched us with its contents. I remarked that we looked as though a herd of cows had passed over us and 'dropped their load' (though the latter part wasn't the precise phrase used). Over the years, whenever we recalled the event (which happened when we were primary school kids), we always referred to it as 'The Day The Cows Passed Over'.
He also humorously calls himself 'a bear of very little brain', adding 'Tiddely Pom', which was a direct reference to the time I'd bought a Winnie The Pooh book and brought a poem containing the phrase to his attention. When we were out that night, we kept repeating the full poem (short as it was) and couldn't help laughing at the sheer silliness of it. (Ah, the exuberance of youth.) This had happened only around a couple or so years before he joined the Navy, and with that curious paradox of time, seemed fairly recent and also ages ago at the same moment.
He also scribbles the phrase 'Biffo The Bear Is An Easter Egg With Legs' in the top margin of a letter, which recalls the time we were on our way home after visiting a friend* and saw a father write the phrase (backwards from our point of view) in the condensation on his kid's bedroom window. I assumed he remembered the circumstances, but was surprised when he asked me on one of his visits back to Scotland just where it came from. I explained its origin, but he had no memory of the event. "Then why did you write it in your letter?" I asked. "Because you did in yours, and I found it funny" was his reply.
Another random thing he wrote on one letter, unconnected to its contents, was 'Rubber Buttons'. This referred back to a conversation we'd had as young teens, about the so-called 'short trousers' we wore as kids. Back then, short trousers ended just above (or touching) the knees and were higher-waisted. Their flies had far too many buttons (seemingly made of a dense rubber) which were difficult and time-consuming to undo, resulting in having to hoist up a trouser leg to have a wee, as it took too long to open the fly. When you were desperate, trying to undo the buttons was like moving in slow-motion, so long did it take (or appear to).
What's more, short trousers were thicker back then (as well as longer), and when you rolled up a leg, it resulted in something resembling a concertina that was spring-loaded, threatening to unfold over the 'little chap' and getting soaked in pee in the process (both trousers and said 'little chap'). Oh, the hardships, trials and tribulations we had to suffer in the '60s.
There was so much more; references to people we knew, jobs I'd had, places we'd frequented, etc. I'm glad I never threw his letters out as they allowed me a brief return into the past, and my demised youth that yet calls to me on occasion, but tauntingly teases me by remaining just beyond my firm and tangible grasp. The rough pencil sketch at the top of this post is a quick drawing I did of him one night (I think) in the flat of a mutual friend (*same one as alluded to above), which said friend had in his possession for a good while until I reclaimed it from him. It's been back in my ownership for decades now, from before I eventually realised my childhood pal had 'grown up' into a person I no longer liked or found amusing and let him follow his own path.
It was good to revisit him from a time before this though, even if it was all-too-brief. As is life, sadly. It's a shame I never made copies of my own letters before I sent them, just so I could read his correspondence in context, but it simply never occurred to me to do so way back then.
Any similar stories, Crivvies? If so, let's hear them.
Monday 13 May 2024
MORE FACSIMILES FROM MARVEL AND DC... (Updated)
Images copyright relevant and respective owners |
I don't know about you, but when I buy a facsimile edition of a comicbook, I don't expect (nor do I want) footnotes from publishers prominently posturing in a politically 'correct' way and thereby compromising a mag's historical 'integrity'. Look at that caption under the splash atop the indicia in the above example - no, Marvel, no! The 2019 facsimile didn't have it, so why does the 2024 version need it? Newsflash! It doesn't, and I just wish Marvel (and anyone else) would cease trying to convert us to whatever the current woke fashion in thinking happens to be.
Hitherto, Marvel have trumped DC in (at least) one important way with their facsimiles, and that's with the reproduction quality of the ads. In most cases, DC scan their ads from published comics of the past, and they look faded and just a bit rough, whereas Marvel (and don't ask me how they do it) usually manage to reproduce their ads in such a way as to make them look brand-spanking new and as sharp as they first appeared. In the recent facsimile of The Flash #105, the ads have curved corners in some instances, indicating that they were either scanned from a comic with spine roll, or a bound volume, but DC need to do better in this department.
Having said that, look below at the same ad from a recent DC facsimile compared to a Marvel one; surprisingly, the DC example is of a much higher quality than Marvel's, so at least DC is improving and may yet overtake their rival's replica editions when it comes to the reproduction quality of the adverts. Anyway, thought you might like to see the covers of some more recent facsimiles from the top two comics publishers so feast your eyes, effendis! And if you have any thoughts and observations you'd like to share with your fellow Crivs, feel entirely free to do so in the comments section.
This is the new 2024 printing - it was also published in 2021 |
This is the 2023 printing - it was also published in 2019 (when it was only $4.99) |
Click to enlarge, then click again for optimum size |
Sunday 12 May 2024
REVIEW OF DOCTOR WHO...
Let's not waste words - the two episodes were dreary drivel, turgid tosh, and pointless pish. I could barely stay awake through either of them. They'll have to try a helluva lot harder than this if they want to win my vote. Thoughts, anyone? (And the figures in my Corgi Toys Yellow Submarine bear more of a likeness to The Beatles than the actors chosen for the roles did.)
Wednesday 8 May 2024
THREE DC FACSIMILE EDITIONS...
Copyright DC COMICS |
Sunday 5 May 2024
GREG'S THE KING OF THE CASTLE (COMICS)...
Wednesday 1 May 2024
STAR TREK - The OLD And The NEW SFX...
Original visual effect. Copyright relevant owner |
Enhanced visual effect |
Original visual effect |
Enhanced visual effect |
Original visual effect |
Enhanced visual effect |