![]() |
| Copyright relevant owner. (Will they have the guts to admit to it?) |
Take a look at the above abomination - TRIFFIK!, from 1992. If a worse comic than this ever saw the light of day, then thankfully I don't remember ever seeing it. From the amateurish, awkward masthead to the sub-standard, awful balloon lettering, almost everything about this comic was wrong. Even the handful of strips that were quite well drawn suffered from being poorly lettered and surrounded by other strips which must have been scrawled by drunken chimps with a burnt match during a break-out from the zoo.
I duly contacted the editor, who had no previous experience working in comics, and suggested that the lettering needed to be improved. (I wasn't looking for work, being quite busy with my regular assignments in 1992.) His response? "I like it the way it is!" I even sent him a detailed colour 'rough' of a new logo, based on the old one, but bolder, brighter and better. His response? "Roughs are no good - I can't envision the finished result. You need to show me why yours is better by doing the proper, finished article." (Despite the quotes, I'm paraphrasing his comments from memory.) So, an editor with no ability, no vision and no clue. Don't get me wrong - he was a nice enough bloke, but he was never cut out for comics in a professional capacity.
I understand that the comic only lasted for twelve issues - which was about a dozen too many in my humble estimation. I never bought another one as I had plenty toilet paper at the time and had no need for more. It remains an object lesson on how not to do a comic.
You'd think a certain Dundee-based publication currently having circulation problems would have learned a valuable lesson from the sad but inevitable fate of Triffik!, eh? H'mm, apparently not. What is it they say? "Those who don't learn from history, are doomed to repeat it." Let's all hope it doesn't turn out to be the case.














.jpg)