I may still have my original copy of R.M. Ballantyne's book The Gorilla
Hunters up in my loft somewhere. If so, it lost its dust-jacket long
ago, but I still have an image in my mind of what it looked like. I
wouldn't even know which box to start on in search of it, which is why I
bought a 'generic' copy on eBay a month or two back when I fancied re-reading it 47 or so
years after the fact. At a guess, I was given it in 1970 or '71 as a Sunday School* prize for regular attendance (not that I wanted to go), but I didn't get
around to actually reading it until 1972 or '73.
(*Actually, if I'm correct as to when I got the book, I'd have been too old for Sunday School, so it would've been something for older kids and young teenagers called 'Junior Church'.)
At least that's the way I remember things, but my memory isn't quite as sharp these days as it once was. I enjoyed re-reading the book, though more from the perspective of revisiting a past pleasure than it being a particularly gripping book. I remember taking it into secondary school with me one day and reading it in an annexe hut at the back end of the 'Old Block', but whether I'd started the book prior to then is now beyond my ability to recall. (Though in memory I was back in that classroom when I started reading it again, if that counts for anything.)
As an aside, the teacher in that hut once said an interesting thing to me, though I couldn't say whether it was on that specific day or a different one. "Gordon, you can tell you're an artist, because of your handwriting. You've probably got the best handwriting in the school." I find that of interest because I'd also been commended in class for my handwriting in my two primary schools, so that made my ability to produce pleasing penmanship unanimous. Perhaps I was destined to be a calligraphic artist from an early age, eh?
(Fairness demands I mention the fact that, when I later changed my style to using loops in my writing in the way that my mother did, another teacher said "Considering you're so good at drawing, it's surprising that your handwriting is so terrible." I immediately reverted to my previous loop-free style.)
Anyway, back to the gorillas. In the late '70s I bought The Coral Island by the same author, published in 1857, four years before The Gorilla Hunters (which featured the same three main characters as the first book, but older). Again, I no longer recollect (at the moment of typing, maybe it'll come back to me) whether I happened upon The Coral Island by chance, or specifically acquired it because I'd read its 'sequel' several years before. I'd have to re-read 'Coral' before I could tell you if it's as good as I remember it to be, but my general impression is that it was superior to 'Hunters'.
(Interestingly, it's said that R.L. Stevenson was so impressed by 'Coral' that he based features of Treasure Island on parts of it.)
The word 'nigger' (singular and plural) is used quite profusely in 'Hunters' (which is set mainly in the African jungle), but not necessarily in an intentionally insulting or demeaning way, and certainly not in a way which suggests that Ballantyne may have been a racist. In fact, I could detect no negative attitude towards Negroes in general, and the three white protagonists seem to have a fond and respectful regard for the tribes (and certain individuals) they encounter. The book was written in 1861, so is obviously a product of its time, but probably best not to read it if you're easily offended by the language of a vanished age.
Anyway, to round this off (you'll no doubt be glad to hear), I saw a copy of the book with the dust-jacket I remember on eBay and bought it yesterday (the book, not eBay), so it's hopefully winging its way to me as I type. (Update: Now arrived. As always, it's good to be reunited with yet another aspect of my past.) Anyone else ever read The Gorilla Hunters? If so, what was your impression of it? Hit or miss?
******
It seems that my new replacement, pictured above, of the original copy I had (and might still have) back in the early '70s is an abridged edition, as comparing it with the one I re-read a few weeks back, I notice that there are some differences. Obviously I'm not going to read the book again to see what they all are, but at a cursory glance, I see that one chapter has had a religious allusion removed, and chapters shortened, perhaps even combined, as it has two chapters fewer than the one I bought a month or so ago.
.jpg)
.jpg)
