A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, cartoons & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial content! With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, rueful reflections, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, poignant ponderings & yearnings for yesteryear! (To say nothing of a few profound perplexities & puzzling paradoxes thrown in for good measure.) Plus a bevy of beautiful, bedazzling, and buxom 'Babes'!
Tuesday, 18 December 2018
REFLECTIVE REPOST - IS THE 'ART' BEING TAKEN OUT OF COMICS?
Front page of hand-lettered promotional leaflet, sans address &
As regular readers of this humble blog should know by now (all four of them), your fearless host has never been one to avoid subjects of a controversial nature. So, let's once more leap into the fray and tackle the topic of the role of computers in comics, and whether or not they've taken some of the 'art' out of the process of producing them. With that subject in mind, I once enquired of a computer-colourist if he'd be able to colour a comic the traditional way, by hand. "No!", was his short and honest answer. Apparently, he didn't think he had sufficient ability and was therefore dependent on technology to enable him to make his comic contributions.
Technology has taken over in other areas too. Lettering, for example. Most comics nowadays are lettered by computer fonts, enabling practically anyone who can type (which is just about everyone) to overlay speech-balloons, text panels, sound effects and logos onto a comics page. All of which most of them would be unable to create by their own hand to a satisfactory professional level.
From the reader's point of view I don't suppose it matters so long as it's done well, although I find all those perfectly elliptical balloon shapes quite tedious. I prefer the spontaneity of hand-lettering (again, when it's done well), because it permits the letterer to accommodate the artist's layout in a far more personal and sympathetic manner than computer fonts can allow for.
When I used to earn a full-time living from lettering many years ago now, I took great delight in making speech-balloons fit in spaces that one would think had no room for them, and to do it in such a way that didn't seem forced and awkward-looking. For the most part I succeeded, and derived immense satisfaction from making a page look as if art and lettering were an 'organic' whole. I find that a lot of computer-lettering looks as if it isn't part of the artwork, but rather some 'disembodied' shape that floats over the surface of each panel.
Promotional leaflet's centre-page spread of hand-lettered logos
A few years back, I briefly considered returning to comics work and had a go at computer-lettering with some fonts someone lent me, just to see what the process was like. How mind-numbingly tedious compared to the joy of handling an actual page of art and affixing the lettering directly onto the page or acetate overlay (for colour work) in such a way as to make it a 'finished' piece. I soon abandoned the exercise as it afforded me not even an iota of creative satisfaction. I felt like a secretary. (Which is fine if that's what you want to be.)
I should make it absolutely clear that I have no problem with genuine hand-letterers putting their fonts onto a computer programme and going down that route. After all, these guys have been in the trenches for years and earned their stripes, so anything that makes their job a little quicker or easier is not something I'm going to grudge them. Legendary 2000 A.D. calligrapher TOM FRAME eventually resorted to computer-lettering (I believe his deteriorating eyesight made it increasingly difficult for him to continue in the 'old-fashioned' way), but he'd earned the right to do so, and it was his own lettering style he utilised.
It niggles me though, when I see some of the newer people called letterers when they should more properly be credited as typographers - or in some cases, just plain typists. After all, they couldn't letter by hand if their lives depended on it.
If you can'tplay thegame, then don'twear thename.
(Agree or disagree? Feel free to let me know, but try and do it without cussing. You know how sensitive I can be.)