Sunday 7 July 2019

THE FIRST GRAPHIC NOVEL - GUEST POST BY BARRY PEARL...

All images copyright their respective owners

The Mighty BARRY PEARL has done it again - but this time he has surpassed himself.  Barry examines the origins of what is known the 'Graphic Novel', and his diligently-researched post may well surprise you.  Don't take my word for it - read it and see for yourselves.

******


What was the first Graphic Novel?

The first illustrated or "picture" stories were probably done in hieroglyphics thousands of years ago and signed by Stan Lee.  The term Graphic Novel,  as it applies to the "long-form comic book", was coined in November 1964 by Richard Kyle in Capa-alpha #2, a newsletter published by the Comic Amateur Press Alliance.  As with the term "Film Noir", Graphic Novel is a term applied retroactively.  Since the 1970s the term Graphic Novel has often been used to mean comic books for older people.


It is interesting that Classics Illustrated, which adapted novels into comics, is not a factor in the Graphic Novel's development, although they could have been its logical first step.  And so could have Milt Gross' He Done Her Wrong! from 1930.  But while Gross's book does tell a story graphically, he uses no words whatsoever, so it is graphic, but really not a novel.


The Graphic Novel came into its own in the mid-1970s.  These novels would no longer be orphans at the newsstands when comic book stores began to flourish.  In the mid-1970s readers could see that Marvel's creators were looking for something more than an episodic comic.  By this time, Jack Kirby was outgrowing the comic book medium and seemed to be searching for something more complex and less collaborative.  Steve Ditko, in his 170-page story arc starting in Strange Tales #130 (Mar 1965), also seemed to be distributing a Graphic Novel into his ten monthly Doctor Strange pages.  Jim Steranko's story, "Dark Moon Rise, Hell Hound Kill!" in Nick Fury #3, was also a forerunner, showing the format, but not the length, of what could come.  When Steranko created his first true graphic novel, "Chandler", he had to find another publisher.


Comics, like TV shows, had mostly been episodes in a series, each edition or each comic having a beginning, middle and an end.  A novel does not have episodes, it has chapters that seamlessly build on previous chapters and they cannot exist separately as an episode does.


What is a Graphic Novel and what should we look for in one?  We need to go back to the mid-1800s, when Rodolphe Topffer, a Swiss innovator of the comic strip, described the essential nature of a picture story.  Topffer understood that the drawings and the text must be symbiotic:

"The drawings without their text, would have only a vague meaning;  the text, without the drawings, would have no meaning at all.  The combination of the two makes a kind of novel, all the more unique in that it is no more like a novel than it is like anything else."  In 1837, Topffer published what many consider to be the first comic book, The Adventures of Obadiah Oldbuck (Les Amours de M. Vieux Bois) which he wrote and drew.  In America it was published as a newspaper supplement.


A Graphic Novel should be both graphic and a novel.  The Oxford English Dictionary says that a novel is:  "a fictitious prose narrative or tale of considerable length (now usually one long enough to fill one or more volumes), in which characters and actions representative of the real life of past or present times are portrayed in a plot of more or less complexity."  Therefore, a Graphic Novel should contain illustrations that help tell a longer, involved and complete story.  However, The Oxford English Dictionary defines the Graphic Novel as a "full length story published as a book in comic strip format."  It demotes "novel" to story and illustration to "comic strip" because that is the way we use this term.  I do not know why some of their significance is lost when both words are combined.

Jim Steranko and many others claim that a graphic novel cannot contain word balloons.  As such, Steranko calls them "fat comics".  He has a point that, many times, publishers put out trade paperbacks filled with long or collected comic book stories and call them "graphic" novels, when they are just fat comics.  But for me, whether the text is in balloons or at the bottom of the page (as Hal Foster did in Prince Valiant), what is important is that they are dependent on each other to tell the story.  We should recognize the difference between a fat, well-bound comic and a Graphic Novel.  A Graphic Novel should be self-contained, and not a "collected" edition of several short stories.


In 1976, Bloodstar (Morningstar Press) gave us an early indication.  The cover said the book was "a science fiction/fantasy adventure in words and pictures."  In addition, Bloodstar "is a new, revolutionary concept -- a graphic novel, which combines all the imagination and visual power of comic strip art with the richness of the traditional novel."  The story was illustrated and adapted by Richard Corben from an original story by Robert E. Howard.


Many feel that the modern graphic novel was born in 1950 when "It Rhymes With Lust!" by Arnold Drake, Leslie Waller and Matt Baker was published by Archer St. John.  It was described as a "picture novel."  Even in 1950, Arnold Drake saw the medium as one for adults:

"As we worked with the comics form, we reasoned that for the ex-GIs who read comics while in the services and liked the graphic style of storytelling, there was room for a more developed comic book -- a deliberate bridge between comic books and book-books.  I… came up with the logo that would adorn the cover: a paintbrush and a pencil crossed over a book cover and the letters PN, for Picture Novels. What we planned was a series of Picture Novels that were, essentially, action, mystery, Western and romance movies ON PAPER.  The trouble came when it was time to market it.  There would be no space on the stands for this one odd-ball-product.

This (and the cover sketch above) is Arnold Drake's layout for 'It Rhymes
With Lust'.  (Originally called 'One Man Too Many' in its draft stage)

"I don't think there is much question that "It Rhymes with Lust" was the first graphic novel.  It wasn't a stumbling, accidental creation.  Les and I knew exactly what we set out to create.  The fact that it was essentially a ‘B Film’ on paper, rather than the more sophisticated products that came 25 years later and called themselves ‘Graphic,’ speaks to the change in the readership over those years.  The sons and daughters of the veterans who went to school on the GI Bill were a very different market than the one that Les and I dealt with back then.  I have no idea what the first Picture Novel would have been had we had that broader, deeper audience."

St. John also published a second Graphic Novel, "The Case of the Winking Buddha"but sales of both were weak and the line was discontinued.


In 1955, EC published Picto-Fiction which was inspired by Big Little Books.  It was another example of illustrated stories, not novels, trying to reach an older audience.

Let us not confuse the Graphic Novel with the format that it was originally presented in.  When Charles Dickens wrote many of his books they were published as serials, chapter by chapter, in magazines.  This approach to marketing novels was common in the nineteenth century.  If we keep this fundamental point in mind, then it is not very difficult to accept that Kirby's pre-history of the graphic novel begins with Tales of Asgard which started in Journey into Mystery #97 and ended in issue #145.  It is 245 pages.


Gil Kane would publish two stories that had great influence in developing graphic novel concepts:  "His Name is... Savage!" (1968) and "Blackmark" (1971).


The first, full, graphic novel that I read was "Chandler: Red Tide" by Jim Steranko in 1977.  It was a hardboiled detective story intended for adults. It was exciting and extremely well written, drawn and designed.  Like Lust, it had the look and feel of a film noir movie.  Its look, form and subject matter have helped jump-start the genre and obviously influenced the creators of "Sin City" and "The Road to Perdition".  Jim Steranko observed:  "When the book appeared it was not embraced by the comic-book community because it didn't have word balloons or captions."  In other words, it was not a comic book, it was truly a graphic novel.  Steranko did not create the Graphic Novel, he merely perfected it.


Byron Preiss, Chandler's publisher: "RED TIDE was an original, mass-market adult crime novel created to retail at American newsstands alongside hundreds of other paperback offerings… It supported its claim to be a graphic novel by adopting the use of continuous text and chapter breaks in traditional literary fashion, with all story pages featuring two panels, the size of which remained constant throughout the volume.  Standard comic-book devices, such as captions and dialogue balloons, were not employed.  The unique text-and-image format was used here for the first time.  Rather than using typical comics' storytelling, Steranko developed a narrative approach that mirrored the noir films of the 1930-40s and an illustration style that utilized both a hard and soft-edged treatment (without an inkline or feathering) that approximated cinematic photography, a technique that took RED TIDE another step away from comics.


Fiction Illustrated had earlier published two books that might easily be mistaken for graphic novels.  The first, "Schlomo Ravenby Tom Sutton was a light-hearted detective novel.  It had a style reminiscent of Will Elder's work in Mad.  A second book, "Starfawn" by Stephen Fabian, was a science fiction comic book for adults and was told in a traditional comic book style, complete with dialogue balloons.


The term Graphic Novel appeared on the title page and on the dust jacket.  Will Eisner's "Contract With God" (1978) is an enjoyable, absorbing tale that is a big step toward serious, adult graphic stories.  It was written soon after the tragic death of Eisner's own daughter.  It is not really a graphic novel - it wasn't long or detailed enough, it was a graphic memoir or short story.


"Maus: A Survivor's Tale" is a memoir by Art Spiegelman and is a great example of what a Graphic Novel can be.  It tells the story of Spiegelman's father who survived the Holocaust, but he uses cats and mice as the central characters.  In 1992 it won a Pulitzer Prize Special Award.  A small part was reprinted by Marvel in a black and white magazine, Comix Book in 1977.


Could Marvel and DC have produced graphic novels, or comic series?  We have a hint with Kirby's Eternals and New Gods.  I'd like to feel that the medium has evolved and has grown in the last few decades.  When I see the term "graphic novel" I hope to get more than just a long comic book story.  I would like to see stories "in which characters… are portrayed in a plot of more or less complexity" where the pictures and text are both necessary to tell the story.  There should be more experimentation as we have seen in Chandler and Maus.


Captain Marvel is correctly regarded as Marvel's first Graphic Novel.  It dealt with death in an adult manner that removed it from the typical comic book demise, albeit not without the comic book melodrama that goes hand in hand with any serious topic.  It had a beginning, a middle and a conclusion that you usually don't find in comics.  The Graphic Novel must take us to places we cannot go in a comic book.  As our expectations mature we anticipate more.  Yes, there are bad Graphic Novels and they should not be confused with "fat" comics.

So what was the first Graphic Novel?  Other than satisfying a creator's ego, it probably does not matter.  There are no "Firsts" in Comics.  Many concepts, thought to be original when used by the major publishers, may have first appeared earlier in the more obscure ones, not available on local newsstands.  Comics were published internationally and American historians tend not to consider them.  So if you read and enjoy "a fictitious prose narrative or tale of considerable length… portrayed in a plot of more or less complexity" it's a Graphic Novel.

So the first Graphic Novel is the one you read first - whether it had dialogue balloons or not!

******

Okay, Criv-ites, don't let me down.  Barry has put a lot of work into this post, even supplying the images, so be sure to leave a comment showing your appreciation.  Just think - if not for Barry, you'd be stuck with reading something by me!  (Yeah, doesn't bear thinking about, does it?)

37 comments:

Ralph H said...

Fascinating article. Always thought that Eisner invented the graphic novel. Thank you to the writer for this interesting post. Longtime reader, first time I've commented.

Kid said...

I'd read that too about Eisner's book, RH, but I also knew there was debate as to whether it actually was or not. Barry's post has helped clarify things for me.

Barry Pearl said...

A Contact With God was the first to use the term ‘graphic novel” on the cover. But is was not the first and it really is not a novel, it is a short story. A great one.

Kid said...

Yup, that's what I figured, Barry - 'Contract' was thought of as the first graphic novel because it was the first to describe itself as such. Could it be described as a graphic novella do you think?

Vanderwolff said...

Incredible overview---I especially appreciate the seldom noted Rodolphe Topffer connection to the development of the medium, and the subjective but very logical distinction between the more standard pictures-plus-word balloons format (Steranko's blunt but on-point assessment: "fat comics") vs. the graphic element being separate in placement from the narrative content.

Very well-researched while maintaining a high level of engagement about the subject, not just another scholarly run-through. Excellent, thank you for sharing!

Kid said...

And thank you for commenting, V - and thanks again to Barry for writing it.

Dave S said...

Very interesting and illuminating. I had thought Blackmark was the first, and feel a little dim that I'd never realised Classics Illustrated were basically early graphic novels.

I must admit I find the term 'graphic novel' a little pretentious in most cases- for me there's nothing wrong with just calling them comics, although I do realise that, from a marketing point of view, 'graphic novel' makes them sound more sophisticated.

Great post Barry, thanks!

Kid said...

I'm sure that Barry appreciates your appreciation, DS, and will probably pop up to say so himself at some stage.

Barry Pearl said...

Thanks DS! Yeah, I think bookstores prefer the term graphic novel also. That time seems to invite older readers. A contract with God is really not for young readers.

Kid said...

Told ya! Thanks Barry!

Anonymous said...

Great article. Thinking about other potential early US 'graphic novels' I would consider some of the Thomas/ Smith/ Buscema REHoward adaptions ( I am thinking in particular Red Nails), Silver Surfer book by Lee & Kirby, The Tarzan Pan albums and Sabre by MCGregor and Gulacy. Others, given the inclusion of New Gods and Eternals could be Starlin's early Thanos and Warlock storylines, the Panther's Rage, and Gerber's Headmen storyline. And thanks for reminding me about Maus, surely still the best US graphic novel ever done. However.....was Europe (especially France and Belgium) not publishing graphic novels much earler on????
Spirit of '64

Kid said...

I think you're probably right about graphic novels being first done in Europe, S64, but I assume that Barry was restricting himself to American publications. I'm not sure that collected editions of episodic series necessarily qualify as graphic novels though - unless, of course, it was the writer's intention from the start - which would probably rule out Kirby's Fourth World material as he sort of made it up as he went along, issue to issue. I'd say the term better applies to stories that are completely written and drawn before their first publication. There are probably exceptions though.

Barry Pearl said...

I did mention this in the blog. It was very common for comic companies to combine 6 or so issues in a trade paperback and call it a "graphic novel." It is really a collection. Kirby struggled with the graphic novel in "Hunger Dogs" allegedly a conclusion to the New Gods. Kirby spent his entire life creating characters that would last forever and he had trouble ending stories. That happened several times

Anonymous said...

I take your point, although I would note that many classic novels ( not graphic novels) were first published in serialised form....as was of course was Maus ( in Raw for example...just shifting back to graphic novels). Thinking about a Contract with God...was this not serialised in Kitchen Sink's Spirit, and before Contract with God, was there not another GN from Eisner called 'A Signal from Space?'Apologies if I am getting this wrong, but I am doing this from memory....
Spirit of....forgot year!

Kid said...

In the case of The Hunger Dogs though, Barry, don't forget that around 14 or 15 years had elapsed since New Gods, and there was no realistic way he could wrap it up satisfactorily in two new instalments. (The new story in the 6th issue of the reprint series, and Hunger Dogs itself.) Had the title not been cancelled, perhaps he'd have been able to draw it to a more natural conclusion in the fullness of time. Mark Evanier thinks (if I recall rightly) that Kirby had probably forgotten his original intended conclusion - assuming that he ever actually had one.

Kid said...

It would be interesting to know whether those classic novels were written in serialised form though, S64, or merely published that way. Perhaps they were completed before the first instalment was published? Anyone know?

Anonymous said...

Barry
I don't think Kirby could ever follow a script or someone else's storyline, which is probably why the marvel method came about ( a reference to one of your previous guest blogs!). I think Mark Evanier one told a story about how the King told Mark and Steve Sherman about a coming storyline, only to be dumbfounded when they saw the completed pages that Kirby had put down a completely different tale!
Other possible early US GNs....DC's Tales from the Bible, Kirby's 2001 Treasury and Cap's Bicentennial Battles, Superman vs Spider-man/WWoman/Shazam/ Mohammed Ali and various other DC Treasuries, plus some smaller 100 pagers featuring Superman and Wonder Woman ( this one featuring art by Ditko from memory). They may not fit the criteria as having adult storylines of course......
Spirit of '64

Anonymous said...

Kid,
I am thinking of Dickens primarily. Conan Doyle also did all his famous works in this way. I recall reading that there were riots outside CD'ss house when he killed off Sherlock Holmes and was forced to bring him back....although this is just an aside ( an interesting one I hope) rather than evidence as to whether Conan Doyle wrote the stories in chapter form before any serialisation.
S64

Kid said...

Doyle didn't bring Holmes back 'til years later, I think, though he wrote Hound Of The Baskervilles in between to assuage demand for more Holmes stories. In the case of 'Hound' though, it was set before Holmes' death. I'm not sure if anyone knows whether Dickens or Doyle wrote the complete stories before publication, which were then issued in serial form, or wrote each instalment prior to individual publication, but I'd assume that they had the events of each story pretty thoroughly worked out in advance, with allowances for sudden inspiration. Kirby, however, as you point out in your reply to Barry, seemed never to have anything set in stone - apart from the basic concept that each story was set against.

Barry Pearl said...

It's a shame that no one seems to treat Classic's Illustrated with the respect it deserves. It really did bring novels, and current events, into comics. And it had many top quality artists draw them. I have seen so many self proclaimed comic book "historians" dismiss them.

They were wonderful comics and, since the company is out of business, there has been no consistent effort to reprint them. (Yes there have been a few reprinted here and there.)

Kid said...

I've got a couple (at least) Classics Illustrated from the '60s (maybe UK editions), plus a recent hardback version of The Wind In The Willows. However, they were a different kind of graphic novel, seeing as they were done in a single, normal-sized comic, rather than a book-sized (I'm talking page-count) publication. (I assume there's a difference.)

The two CIs I've got are Frankenstein and The Time Machine.

Anonymous said...

Going back to initial list I would love to read The Chandler and the Bloodstar graphic novels.
Spirit of 64

Kid said...

I wonder if they're still in print? Or available through ebay at a reasonable price? Barry is sure to know.

Barry Pearl said...

They are both out of print and expensive to get on Ebay. Steranko told me that there would be a new edition five years ago but it never happened.

Kid said...

Thanks, Barry. The Parker graphic novels by Richard Stark & Darwyn Cooke are worth a read, as are the original novels themselves.

Barry Pearl said...

I enjoyed the New Frontier

Kid said...

I think I had four of them, all of which I enjoyed. Shame he's not around to do more.

Edit: Oops, wasn't paying attention, Barry. (Yeah, New Frontier wasn't a Parker book.) The amazing thing is, I looked at my own copy of New Frontier to remind myself how to spell his name, but it never clicked that was what you were referring to. I must be tired so I'm off to my scratcher.

Anonymous said...

I am a big Darwyn Cooke fan. For me, the Selina's Big Score GN is the bees knees. I have very few comics from this century, and, of those I have, works by Cooke take a big %.
Spirit of 64

Kid said...

I've also got that one myself, S64. It's a shame that I only really became familiar with his work after he died. Wish I could remember where I put Selina's Big Score so that I can re-read it. I'll have to dig through my room.

Barry Pearl said...

Kid, i learn a lot on this site, even when I post! For example, I did not know that Bees had knees. I’d hate to see an arthritic bee with a walker. Henry Pym might be needed.

Kid said...

'The Bee's Knees' - yeah, it's a well known saying meaning 'top class' or 'important', depending on the context in which it's used. Don't Americans use that expression, Barry? I've used it before, but I don't think it's in this blog post. Incidentally, a bee would probably need more than a walker (too many legs), he'd need a wheelchair.

Barry Pearl said...

Oh my srats and garters. I was just having fun.

Kid said...

I know - so was I. Didn't know you wore garters though.

Guy Lawley said...

Odd how no-one ever mentions this one (it would have hit the stands in late 1971).
:0)
I think Paul Gravett drew my attention to it some years back.
https://www.comics.org/issue/75432/cover/4/

Kid said...

Despite describing the story as a 'graphic novel', it's really just a comic though, isn't it, GL? By that standard, you could call any comic a graphic novel.

Guy Lawley said...

Hiya, Kid.
I hoped the :0) in my showed that I wasn't seriously suggesting that Sinister House of Secret Love 2 was actually the 'first US graphic novel'— not 'as we mean the term now'.
But it wasn't just any old comic, either; it was AFAIK the first publication in the comics medium to label itself a graphic novel. Doesn't that at least merit a mention in the discussion?
Plus: asking ourselves why it was labelled that way, in 1971, might provoke some useful thought; after all, the term 'graphic novel' wasn't exactly commonly used back then. It's possible that editor Joe Orlando or his assistant Mark Hanerfeld had read Capa-Alpha or another fan usage.
More likely, though, they called it a graphic novel because DC was trying to sell into the *big* market for gothic romance novels that existed at the time in prose books. As you'll know, they had two of these gothic romance comics — Dark Mansion of Forbidden Love 2 similarly had 'A full-length novel of love and danger complete in this issue' on its cover.
https://www.comics.org/issue/24467/
Both titles obviously tried hard to emulate the look of the book genre. At 39 pages SHOSL 2's story was double the length of other comics, and self-contained, with a beginning a middle and an end.
So Sinister House of Secret Love 2 wasn't just 'any comic'-- it was comic with a mission. And the mission was: sell stand-alone non-serialised comics to people who probably don't buy superheroes, but read novels.
Which does link it to the 'real' graphic novel phenomenon of Eisner and his successors, doesn't it? The graphic novel phenomenon as it developed was after all to a large extent a business practice aimed at selling books into the bookshops as well as the comics speciality outlets.
And to cope with the accelerating demise of the traditional newsstand comics market, which was evident as early as 1971.
All in all I think Sinister House of Secret Love 2 earned its place in the discussion. It should be more than just a footnote.

Kid said...

Not being a user of such symbols, it went completely over my head, but I assumed the point you were making was that the comic was calling itself a graphic novel before the term had been used elsewhere, which is certainly worth a mention. However, because you didn't quite specify exactly what you were getting at, I thought it was worth mentioning that it was a comic, not a novel, and certainly not what people would consider a graphic novel. I think the term is pretentious anyway. Classics Illustrated did what their name suggested: they illustrated classic novels, but the end product was still a comic. Anyway, SHOSL #2 has now earned its place in the discussion thanks to you.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...