I said 're-presented' and not 'reprinted', because the story featured was a
re-creation, a 'tracing', effectively, of enlarged copies (in all likelihood)
of the printed pages from issue #27 in 1939, and not from surviving
period-proof copies from the editorial files.
didn't have proofs or original artwork from which they could reprint a
don't recall whether it was used in the FAMOUS 1st EDITION Treasury-
edition published in 2000. Strange that it took thirty-one years for