Wednesday, 27 June 2012

THE (SECOND) COMING OF CONAN!



Most people will be aware that, when MARVEL decided to launch
their CONAN THE BARBARIAN four-colour comicbook back in 1970,
Big JOHN BUSCEMA was first choice as artist to illustrate the swarthy
Cimmerian's action-packed adventures. Only one problem with that how-
ever - too expensive. There was a severely limited budget for the comic and
writer ROY THOMAS was already paying more than Marvel's publisher
MARTIN GOODMAN had authorised for the rights to use ROBERT
E. HOWARD's sword and sorcery swashbuckler.

Well, the rest is history. The less-expensive BARRY SMITH (later
WINDSOR-Smith) was assigned the task of bringing Conan's comic-
book career to life, which he did with verve and vitality as befitting the bold
barbarian's bombastic and bloodthirsty battles. As we're well aware, John
Buscema eventually did become the series' regular artist (drawing more
issues than anyone else), but what might that first adventure have looked
like had he pencilled the premiere issue as originally planned?

Fortunately, such a possibility isn't merely confined to the realms of
speculation as, in 1994 - nearly half a century after Conan's debut issue -
Big John finally brought his artistic magic to that '70s tale from Conan
The Barbarian #1. Personally speaking, I'd have preferred to see the
story drawn with a more traditional grid-layout without the page-bleeds,
and in colour as opposed to black and white. The last panel in particular
cries out for colour - or even some kind of shading to indicate the moon
against the night sky, as described in one of the captions. As it is, it's
short on some sorely-needed atmosphere and lacks the impact of
Smith's earlier version.

However, despite being robbed of the opportunity to compare
'like-with-like' in the strictest sense, it's fascinating to see Buscema's
take on Thomas's titanic tale, although it would have been even better
had JOE SINNOTT or TOM PALMER performed the inking chores.
Perhaps one day they'll reprint it in colour and give readers a better
idea of what could have been had "the Michelangelo of comics"
(as Smilin' STAN LEE dubbed him) drawn the Hyborian hero's
dynamic debut all those years ago.

Anyway, enjoy "THE COMING OF CONAN!" from the June
'94 issue of The Savage Sword of Conan the Barbarian #222.
Take a look at Conan's first appearance here - then come back and
say which visual version of the tale you prefer - and why.


(The two pages below should be read as a double-page spread.)


















5 comments:

Dougie said...

I like this version well enough but it lacks the exoticism of the original: the alien nature of Tara, the fanciful armour of Smith's Kull, the symbols outside the cave. As a kid, I was struck by the futuristic spacecraft, the element that gave this fantasy a flavour of authenticity. I also like Smith's Kirby-isms.

"Real" Conan is Low Fantasy: historical adventure with supernatural flourishes. Marvel's Conan, under Smith, has an unearthly, dream-like delicacy mixed with comic-book dynamism.

Kid said...

I think the trouble is, Dougie, that Buscema had already long-established his version of Conan by the time he got around to drawing this tale. Had he drawn the character from the start, he would probably have infused the strip with the very qualities you mention. Roy Thomas would have insisted on it, I'm sure. (You can see hints of what Buscema might have done with Conan in the pages of Avengers #75 & 76, with Arkon and his world.)

baab said...

One looks like a magic carpet,the other a dusty old rug.
Both are wonderful.

I would never have seen this either,so thanks for this ,Kid.

I did write a couple of paragraphs but then re read both of your comments at the left hand side and I guess there was nothing more to add.

Anonymous said...

Joe Sinnott and Tom Palmer did ink Conan over John, just before Steve Gan's run. In Sinnott's case, he would have overpowered Buscema's style.

The thing to keep in mind is, look at Conan himself: this is some strapling teenager? Nope, Buscema's version is the fully grown guy.

BWS, basically, was the right guy for that part of the story.

Kid said...

Basically, what I was saying was that IF John had drawn the strip from the start, inked by Sinnott or Palmer, and IF he had been receptive to input and guidance on how Conan should look from Roy Thomas, and IF it had been in colour and a traditional grid layout, then we might have been able to compare Buscema's version more favourably with that of Smith's.

As it is, John was just churning out yet another in a long line of strips with a character he had already developed a style for. He just wouldn't have been trying as hard as Barry was when he drew CTB #1. One can tell from the sparsity of background detail that Big J was just knocking it out.

Smith's version is certainly the more exotic looking and interesting of the two versions, but I believe Buscema would have done a far better job than he later did with that particular story had he tackled it in 1970 instead of 1994.

Also, the Buscema splash page has a grey wash on it which gives it a bit of depth, whereas the remainder of the strip is in black and white. Had the other pages also had the same tone, I think they would have been vastly improved.