Thursday, 27 February 2025

DRAMA VERSUS COMMON SENSE - IS IT WORTH THE SWAP...?

Copyright MARVEL COMICS

Sometimes common sense has to be ignored for the purpose of drama.  For example, remember when James Bond chases a fleeing bad guy up some kind of crane in Casino Royale when all he really had to do was wait for him to come down at some point and capture him then?  Wouldn't have been as dramatic or exciting though, would it, and it could be argued that Bond was so caught up in the chase that he wasn't thinking clearly when he continued the pursuit and placed his own life in extreme danger by doing so.

Same goes for comics.  Take Fantastic Four #1 as another example, where Reed Richards fires a flare gun into the sky to capture the attention of his teammates.  Why not just use the little walkie-talkies of the kind that the Invisible Girl uses in issue 4, instead of seemingly causing a panic among the populace by a smoke-message?  (And would three English words in the sky really start rumours of an alien invasion - according to one cop - within seconds of the group's name appearing?  Even accepting that aliens might be suspected, it would take time for rumours to spread and the cops to hear about them, surely?)

Then we cut to Susan Storm, taking tea with a society friend.  Why doesn't she simply say she has to leave instead of turning invisible?  The short answer is to show the readers what her power is, but it's kind of contrived.  Then she makes things difficult for herself by pushing through a crowd while still invisible.  Surely if she could be seen, people would get out of her way and not inadvertently impede her, but this doesn't seem to occur to her.

And why not turn visible when she gets into the stationary cab/taxi?  The driver must've heard the door open and close and known he had a passenger, and it makes no sense that Sue would trust to sheer chance he'd go anywhere near where she wanted to - or decide to 'cruise' for a fare at precisely that moment.  Jack Kirby obviously intended that the driver was aware he had a hire and it was purely the fact that the money seemed suspended in mid-air that surprised him, not that he didn't know someone was in his cab.  Perhaps an example of a 'failure to communicate' between Stan Lee and Jack for which the 'Marvel Method' became famous for.

We next turn our attention to Ben Grimm, standing inside a men's clothing store.  Despite his bulky form and being swathed in a heavy overcoat, hat, and shades, he seems to have been able to enter the shop without difficulty.  When his attention is drawn to the flare, surely it would make more sense to exit as quietly and as (apparently) easily as he entered, instead of disrobing and crashing through the door frame and drawing unwanted attention to himself?  Of course it would, but this is a short-cut way of showing readers what The Thing looks like and what his 'schtick' is.

And what about that Johnny Storm - what an utter plonker!  He's sitting in a car, yet 'flames on' and reduces it to molten slag, with no regard for igniting the petrol/gasoline and possibly blowing his pals to kingdom come.  (He seems to have learned his lesson to some degree by the time issue 4 rolls around.)  Interestingly, in Stan's surviving two-page synopsis of the first issue, none of these details are present so it's likely that Jack was solely responsible for how each individual character was introduced.


These first half-dozen pages of FF #1 are utterly bereft of logic and common sense, but there are other failings throughout the rest of the mag which I'll leave for another time.  Sure, these liberties are taken for the purpose of creating dramatic impact and introducing the characters and their powers as quickly as possible, but does that excuse such 'shoddy' storytelling?  What do you think, readers?  Tell me and your fellow Crivvies and say how you would've handled this issue had you been responsible for producing it.

9 comments:

Colin Jones said...

I agree the logic is daft but FF #1 was a kids' comic not an entry for the Pulitzer Prize and, as you've already explained, the point is to introduce the readers to the FF and their different powers in a dramatic way. That splash page is iconic and it wouldn't be the same if Reed had got out his walkie-talkie instead to contact the other FF members!

By Crom, tomorrow is 50 years since Savage Sword Of Conan #1 and The Superheroes #1 came out.

Gene Phillips said...

FF #1 reminds me of a dichotomy in Jack Kirby's work. On one hand, he knew how to carefully establish a fantasy situation. Not only had he been doing so for years at stuffy DC, his SF-stories for 1950s Atlas are usually just as deliberately paced, like with 1961's "Beware of Bruttu." But off and on throughout JK's career, you also see him sometimes cut loose, verisimilitude be damned, to get to the fantasy-stuff right away. The Fighting American storis of the 50s strike me that way. We agree that Stan would not have
suggested to Jack how to introduce the new heroes, so Jack felt unconstrained to illustrate the newcomers' powers as quickly as possible, again damning verisimilitude to hell. He probably did feel that with four characters he had to show what they could all do quickly, and part of JK's motive was to keep young readers enthralled so as to justify his paycheck. But I also think JK was a born fantasist and often he just loved cutting loose regardless of narrative problems. It's been argued that this propensity showed up in the Fourth World works: he just kept piling marvels upon marvels and didn't care about consistency-- which had been more of a bugaboo for his editor/collaborator Stan Lee.

Kid said...

All it would have taken is for the FF name to have been intended only as the title and not a flare (with a few other minor tweaks) and the impact of the splash page could've been preserved, CJ. Thanks for reminding me about those two comics - I'll see if I can rustle up a post for later today or tomorrow.

Kid said...

Indeed, GP, he may not have cared, but it may simply be that these little things just didn't occur to him. As CJ pointed out, comics were for kids back then. However, I still think these matters could have been resolved if he'd just given the stories a little more thought. (Not that he was paid enough to do so - so he just jumped into the action, logic be damned.)

Manqueman said...

FF1! How it actually came to be is a massive rabbit hole full of unknowns.
Page breakdowns-wise it looks like nothing Kirby ever drew.
Much of it makes no sense.
Maybe the big unknown is between Kirby and Lee, who brought what to the project.
Tom Brevoort, the current king nerd of comics took a stab at doping it out:
https://tombrevoort.com/2021/08/21/lee-kirby-the-stats-of-fantastic-four-1/
https://tombrevoort.com/2021/08/28/lee-kirby-the-stats-of-fantastic-four-1-part-2/
https://tombrevoort.com/2021/09/06/lee-kirby-the-stats-of-fantastic-four-1-part-3/
https://tombrevoort.com/2021/09/25/lee-kirby-the-stats-of-fantasic-four-1-part-4/
Reader, Tom failed to clear up much of the mystery.
Meanwhile, mixed into it all is this for better or worse:
https://vintageinkwell.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Case-for-Kirby-by-Chris-Tolworthy.pdf
As at least one person noted, they were too busy just getting the stuff produced to pay enough attention to the need to remember for history and prosperity...

Manqueman said...

The tl;dr version seems to be that FF1 came out of some sort of storm of chaos. It definitely was not a 20+pp story drawn from first page to last. Or even meant for FF1. Apparently it was meant for two issues of Amazing Adventures. But even so...

Kid said...

Tom Brevoort's ponderings are speculation of course, which, though interesting, are by no means definitive. FF #1 is 25 pages long and has several continuity errors, but it's certainly possible it was meant to be two episodes in a new series that were joined together. And I'd agree that, at the time, it was just a job to be churned out; neither Lee or Kirby thought they were producing a classic-in-the-making.

Anonymous said...

Kid, Brevoort’s advantage with his posts was access to the original stats from things can be gleaned.
And again, Kirby panel breakdowns are like nothing seen by him before or after strongly suggesting that this was not a smooth gig.
But yeah, sure, it’s one of those mysteries without the possibility of an answer.

Kid said...

When I worked on the Marvel Masterworks volumes, he clearly didn't really know what he was doing to the extent he should have. He used stats of covers that were changed before publication because he didn't spot the difference, he changed hyphenated words to non-hyphenated, thereby compromising the archival integrity of the stories, and he claimed Daredevil #1 was from original proofs, which it very clearly wasn't. (The proofs were good, though they were retouched ones that had quite noticeable differences.) On his blog not that long ago, he showed an Iron Man page in which Shell-head crashes through a plane, and claimed that the pilot was obviously killed in the attack - even though he can be seen parachuting to safety elsewhere on the page. How the hell could he miss it? When the Masterworks series was revived a few years later under new hands, they suddenly became much more archival and sourced from superior proofs. The only wisdom he ever showed was in asking me to work on some volumes in the series. Not really impressed by him to be honest.



Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...