As you all know by now, Crivens! welcomes and even encourages the diverse opinions and observations of others. Whether I write something, or a commenter expresses a viewpoint that a reader disagrees with, said reader is welcome to express their dissent as long as they do so politely. (And, obviously, the first commenter should likewise have expressed his opinion in a polite way.) Having an inquisitive mind, I like a good discussion (even if it's just as an observer) and discussing something - with a cordial exchange of different opinions - is not the same as arguing about something. (Though I grant you, one can sometimes lead to the other.)
I'm therefore surprised why some people even have blogs. Well, that's not quite accurate - I know why they have them - they like to express their opinions on things. Whether it be a new comic, movie, record, etc., some people are consumed by a burning desire to tell the world what they think about it. "Huh, cheek!" you say, "You're the exact same!" Well, I'd say that I belong in a slightly different category, as I maintain a blog because it allows me to exercise my gradually fading mental faculties, not because I feel that others need to know what I think on any given subject. It's therefore the former, not the latter, that leads me to write on whatever topic occurs to me (if anything).
However, even if the accusation were true, at least I'm prepared to entertain and publish other people's views that aren't in accord with my own. How will we ever learn anything if we close our minds and refuse to consider various other viewpoints? Expressing our thoughts and beliefs also serves to exercise our minds in the defence of what we think and believe, or revise our opinions if our defence is found wanting. (True, that probably doesn't happen as often as it ought to.)
As I get older, because of a congenital medical disorder, I find my mind descending into blankness very often, and it can be difficult to gather my thoughts and express them in a coherent way. You may have noticed that I sometimes use 20 words when 10 would suffice, but that's because I have to build my thoughts up, layer upon layer, as I struggle to convey what I'm trying to say or type. My thoughts no longer arrive fully-formed and 'ready for use'. I very often forget words mid-sentence - not just when I'm writing something, but also when I'm speaking. I even forget what I'm talking about and my mind becomes a complete and utter blank.
"So why should we be interested in that?" you might ask. I'm not saying you should be, I'm merely explaining why I still maintain this blog by publishing new posts whenever I can. I'm not trying to batter anyone over the head with the cudgel of my opinion, I'm essentially exercising a tired muscle - my mind - in an attempt to stop it from atrophying any further. Maybe there's a chance I can even kick-start it into renewed vigour by giving it a regular workout. I also use the blog as a personal after-the-fact diary, to record memories of my youth in case I someday forget them. (There's at least one instance of Dementia in my family, and my fear is that I too may become stricken with it.)
However, when it comes to other bloggers, I've often noticed a resistance to any expression of dissenting opinions. You see, if someone writes an enthusiastic review of, say, why it's great that DOCTOR WHO is now a woman - and they invite (or allow) comment - then surely if I (or anyone else) have a contrary opinion, it's no crime to express it? Wrong - it is! At least, it is in the mind of that type of blogger, who only wants the fawning approval and approbation of like-minded souls. If you're of a different mind, then don't you bloody well dare have the effrontery to say so. Dissenting opinions aren't wanted you see, only agreeable ones.
Yes, it's a surprise to me too that some people are so insecure in their beliefs that they're not prepared to be put to the effort of considering whether there might be another way of looking at things. (Or maybe they just can't be @rsed.) They've made up their minds and the intrusion of a contrary opinion isn't welcome, perhaps because, deep down, they know they're incapable of logically or reasonably defending what they're saying, and then they might look silly. And that will be your fault for confusing them by asking for whys and wherefores, merely in an attempt to have an interesting and hopefully rewarding discussion about the subject. (And sometimes just because you think there's another perfectly legitimate way of seeing things.)
Then there are those who consider their pronouncements as authoritative and beyond debate, and who accuse anyone who questions their position as 'just loving an argument'. How dare anyone cast doubt on, or request that they clarify or defend what they believe! It's an ego thing - they've bestowed their 'wisdom' on us, and we should just take it or leave it. Such an attitude allows them (in their mind) to avoid having to justify anything they say if politely called to account. Next time you're on dodgy ground with an opinion on something and someone asks you to explain, or points out a flaw in your thinking, just say "Oh, you just like to argue" and 'refuse to discuss the matter' - then you can declare whatever you want with no comeback.
These bloggers shouldn't really have a comment facility, or at the very least they should have a disclaimer stating that any opinions not in accord with those of the blogger won't be considered or published, so don't bother submitting them. Only comments confirming their point of view are welcome, thanks very much. That would solve their 'problem', wouldn't it? I try and show support for other blogs by leaving a comment so that the blogger doesn't think their efforts are unappreciated, but that doesn't mean I'm going to necessarily tickle their ears by pretending to agree with everything they say when I don't.
Those type of bloggers should do us all a favour; if they're not interested in our reasoned response to their opinion, then they shouldn't bother the rest of us with it in the first place. What's that you say?
"You're not obliged to read their blogs!" Well, that's true (though we usually do if we follow them), but neither are
they obliged to
write them if they're not interested in the reaction their thoughts produce (unless it's a 'positive' one of course). And, as I said, if they're not interested in a
variety of opinions in response, they know what to do. It seems that they want to talk
at us, instead of
with is, and I for one am fed up with it.
Got any thoughts on the matter, fellow Crivs? For or against, let's hear 'em. See, I'm the type of blogger who's interested in what you have to say, good or bad. Just be polite though, huh?
******
Incidentally, you're reading this post in one smooth swift go, but that's not the way in which it was written. It actually hurts my head to apply my mind to something like this, because I no longer have the ability to convey my thoughts as they sequentially occur to me. (Well, sometimes I do, but it's a rare occasion these days when I actually can.) Usually, I have to wrestle with them, struggle with and juggle them before I get a result that's even vaguely comprehensible and that I'm (almost) satisfied with. Of course, I can't always guarantee that my readers will be.
