![]() |
| Copyright DC COMICS |
For a drawing, Supergirl is quite an attractive young woman, wouldn't you say, Criv-Kids? That's probably why I purchased this 1971 Super DC Giant #S-24 64-page ish (not counting covers), so's I could admire her in that mini-skirted costume. (Or maybe I'm kidding.) This comic mag reprints a quartet of tales originally published in Action Comics #s 295 to 298 from 1963, which constitute a complete four-part story from the first to the last.
Modern comics don't do much for me these days, being too dark, too grim, in some cases, too gay (Superman's now got a son who plays for both teams - strewth) and too boring. There are sometimes exceptions of course, but they're few and far between. That's probably why I prefer older comics from the '60s, '70s, '80s, and '90s, a time when superhero comics weren't trying to be storyboards for movies and weren't pursuing an agenda to influence society to accept the tastes of a militant minority, bent on reshaping civilization to their own often dubious notions.
So, let's take a glance at what comics looked like back in 1963 and '71, when their only purpose was to entertain the young and young-at-heart, eh? Oh for these days again - or am I the only person who thinks this way? Feel free to leave a comment if you so desire, especially if, like me, your heart beat a little faster on sight of Supergirl in her skater-like costume when you were a kid. And did you prefer Jim Mooney's or Kurt Schaffenberger's artistic rendition of the Maid Of Might or were you more of a Curt Swan man? Tell the world!
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
1 comment:
Sheesh! Not one comment yet. Everyone must be away on holiday or nobody else fancies Supergirl. After all the effort (several seconds) I put into dreaming up this little post, you ungrateful lot.
Post a Comment