Copyright DC COMICS |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Tuesday, 23 April 2019
SUPERMAN'S PAL JIMMY OLSEN...
7 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Hmmm. I like Kamandi and The Demon. Mister Miracle . New Gods. Jimmy Olsen. Then Forever People. Jimmy I just don’t understand a lot of it. I got the famous Don Rickles issue and I just didn’t get what Kirby was trying to do. I’m still not sure . But thank goodness they redid Superman’s face. Seeing Murphy Anderson on top of Kirby - ugh it was some sort of Frankenstein monster and not in a good way. And I love them both as artists! But it was like Picasso’s Nude descending a Staircase then putting a Raphael head on it. Nightmare shivers .
ReplyDeleteI 'got' it fine even as a 13 year-old, PS, I don't think there was anything hard to understand about it. Kirby's Olsen issues were better than what had gone before and what came after - it's just a shame he didn't do more of them. I also liked Anderson's inking on Jack's Supes and Olsen faces. If you see the original pencils (well, stats of them), the real 'Frankenstein' was the way Jack drew them. Supes' parting is always switching sides, and his hair looks like a bad comb-over in some panels and a dodgy 'syrup' in others. What DC should've done of course, is to have Anderson ink the complete issues, not just some faces. Having said that, I do like Vinnie's inks - just a shame he couldn't have 'fixed' the faces himself.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed what issues I was able to track down back in the day.....our distribution system in my neck of the woods was a bit erratic. Unlike many folks, my first exposure to Kirby was via his DC tenure.....I found out about Marvel later through reprints. I enjoyed the Jimmy Olson run (and Colletta's inks) much more than any other Jimmy Olson stories, but was partial to Mister Miracle and Kamandi.
ReplyDeleteNever thought about Murphy Anderson inking the entire issue, but that would have probably been something to see.
Distribution in Scotland was spotty too, sometimes. I think Kirby had already departed Olsen by the time the issues turned up in Scotland. I didn't even always get them in sequential order, just bought 'em whenever they went on sale in the shops. Olsen was my favourite Kirby DC mag, probably because of Superman.
ReplyDeleteMy conversion to Kirby took a while, not overly fond of his style on first exposure to it but then really connecting with his larger than life dynamic, my favorite period being his '65 - '70 Fantastic Four. Never knew about his DC work until years later. Back in the day I was rather fickle in that I tended to follow artists around from title to title rather than sticking with characters no matter who drew them. So I have a lot of issues from different series featuring various characters as long as they were drawn by John Buscema, Neal Adams, Gene Colan and a few others. Superman is such an iconic and well know character but some artists seem to struggle with the look, Jack clearly being one of them. I wouldn't imagine that he would have been happy with the re-working of his art after he submitted it. Same thing happened to the Hulk with Steranko / Severin, Kirby and Trimpe exchanges of faces on some covers and posters.
ReplyDeleteAccording to Mark Evanier, his assistant at the time, Jack indeed wasn't happy with changes to his art, but tolerated it in 'the spirit of co-operation', PC. However, if it hadn't been for Evanier and Steve Sherman pointing changes out to him, he probably would't even have noticed, as he tended not to look at the comics he worked on once they'd been published. I can see DC's point of view though, as Jack drew Superman's 'S' emblem like Alex Ross did in 'Kingdom Come' and it was too drastically different at that time (the '70s) to leave it like that. Also, Superman's hair looked different in almost every panel. I think DC went too far in a couple of issues (Forever People #1 being one of them), where they had Al Plastino completely redraw Jack's Superman from head to toe, but they had to do something. What they should've done was 'fixed' the 'S' and the hair, but left the face and figure as they were. Having said that however, I didn't really mind Murphy Anderson inking Supes' and Olsen's faces and bringing them into line.
ReplyDeleteAlso, meant to say, Marvel did it as well, often having John Romita ink Jack's Peter Parker and Mary Jane faces to make them 'on-model' in cameo appearances in FF, and Jack often redrew (at Stan's direction) panels by Don Heck, so he did what others did to him - did it first in fact. There was talk a few years ago of Steve Rude redrawing the retouched faces in Olsen to more resemble what Jack had drawn, but it never happened.
ReplyDelete