A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Saturday, 14 July 2018
I'VE SPOTTED A MISTAKE, BUT - 'WHY WON'T THEY BELIEVE ME?'
10 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Y'know, I must've read that story a hundred times and never noticed that.
ReplyDeletePerhaps I should get another hobby, PD? (My current one is spotting trivial mistakes.)
ReplyDeleteYeah .You are dead right heh..the Prof looks like hes talking to the soldiers in the lower one whereas up top hes talking to the martian. Good spotting.
ReplyDeleteTa, LH. Maybe the government should give me a grant to research mistakes in old comics? After all, they give research grants for all sorts of daft things these days.
ReplyDeleteWhat happened to Babe of the Day? I love that feature.
ReplyDeleteJust for you, TD, one will be posted shortly.
ReplyDeleteI guess if you were to apply for a grant enabling investigation for the benefit of the arts but in your case art I would expect them to grant you say around 50000 quid to get you started.
ReplyDeleteThat'd do me nicely, TD - I'm not a greedy person. Where do I apply?
ReplyDeleteThe really bad thing is that it would have been easier to draw it the other, proper, way - just a slightly off-vertical line to continue the edge of his coat.
ReplyDeleteYou might have been slow to spot it, but you still got there first.
I don't remember now if I ever noticed back in 1975, but when I re-acquired the issue a few months back, the error jumped out at me right away. It's only because I couldn't think of anything else to post about that prompted me to bring it to readers' attention. However, it's quite a badly laid-out panel, making me wonder if Gene Colan drew it that way, or the soldiers were moved for its original printing to accommodate the caption box. We have to assume that the prof is on a lower level, with stairs leading up to a higher level where the soldiers are coming through the door. Help! I just can't help pondering such trivialities.
ReplyDelete