Thursday, 13 April 2017

"ANY SPARE CHANGE, GUV'NOR?" LOADS OF IT, MY SON...


Here's a coin set by a company called COINCRAFT, containing an example of every British coin in circulation at the time of QUEEN ELIZABETH II's Coronation in 1953.  Again, not as sharp as they could be due to being scanned in their display case, but only slightly blurred.  And look at the farthing, which ceased being produced in 1956, and was finally demonetised at the end of 1960.  (I think I prefer these old coins to the decimal ones.)

JUST A NOTE TO REMIND YOU. (WELL, TWO, ACTUALLY)...


Look at these two notes from the 1960s.  In total, a mere £1.50 in today's money, but don't they look as though they're worth far more?  There's just something about paper money that somehow gives the impression of having a greater monetary significance.  These notes were known as the Portrait Series, and were around from 1961 to 1971.  Were you around then, and do you remember them? 



PROOF THAT I'M COINING IT IN...



Over the next few days I'm going to be showering you lot with money.  My money.  I collect certain coins and notes, and I'm going to be sharing them with you (visually at least) over several posts.  This one's the 1970 ROYAL MINT Proof Set, with a halfpenny that was never legal tender as the coin was demonetised on July 31st 1969 - making this one a bit of a collectors' item.

I've scanned these coins in their cases, so apologies if they're not 100% in focus, but they're clear enough to let you appreciate their individual aesthetic appeal.

Are you into old coins?  Like me, do you yet regard pre-decimal coins as real money and today's currency as base pretenders?  Tell your fellow Criv-ites in our scintillating comments section, why don'tcha?!
    

BABE Of The DAY - RAQUEL WELCH...



"Look, you handsome hunk, I'll give
you all this cash for just one date" pleads
ravishing RAQUEL WELCH.  You couldn't
afford me, doll - and just what kind of guy
do you think I am anyway?  (Aside from a
 devastatingly handsome one I mean.)

LET'S GET INDUSTRIOUS...



I'm often amused and amazed in equal measure when I hear some people claiming there's still a real comics 'industry' in this country.  I'm having a bit of a guess here, but I suspect if you combined the sales of every genuine British comic available today, the total would still be lower than a mere handful of comics from the '60s & '70s.  One successful title back then sold more than just about any four or five different ones do now, so that pretty much speaks for itself.

"But look at all the comic events taking place," they bleat.  "That proves that there's still a huge interest in comics."  Even if that were true, interest doesn't necessarily equal industry.  Once, comics sold in large numbers without requiring promotion by special events to try and fan a dying spark into a flame.  One could argue that such events prove what dire straits the so-called industry is in.  Comics never needed such 'events' in their heyday.

Far fewer comics writers and artists make a living from the 'industry' now than was once the case (there just isn't the same number of opportunities), so you can regard such optimistic claims by folk trying to 'talk things up' as just that - which is understandable, but not an accurate reflection of reality.  As for those few folk who do get a decent share of work, as somebody once pointed out, if you have a larder full of food at a time of famine, you may wonder why some people are claiming to be hungry, but you're living in a bubble.

I'd find such claims about how healthy the industry is more credible if some of those making them weren't currently recycling old strips in self-publishing ventures in order to supplement their incomes.  Self-publishing is a hobby (or vanity-project) - not an industry.  There's no shame in that of course, but let's call it what it is, not what some folk would prefer it to be.

DON'T BE BLUE - The ORIGINAL X-MEN ARE BACK...

Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

Despite my occasional critiques about 'deficiencies' in JACK KIRBY's art, I'm a huge fan and think that, when he was at the top of his game, he was untouchable.  (Especially when inked by someone like WALLY WOOD.)  So I always get a thrill when I see his early MARVEL work gracing the cover of a contemporary comicbook.

Such a one is X-MEN BLUE #1, the first issue of a new series about the original X-Men, time-plucked from the past into the present day.  It was okay, but I just love the above variant cover, even though Jack's drawn The BEAST with gloves, something he never wore.

If you think this mag might be your cup of tea, it's now on sale at all good comicbook shops.  So race right 'round to your nearest one at the earliest opporchancity and grab yourself a copy before they're all gone.  First come, first served.