![]() |
I saw it too, in my local cinema. It was total p*sh! (The film, not the cinema) |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Sunday, 16 August 2015
THE COMPLETE FANTASTIC FOUR COVER & IMAGE GALLERY - PART NINE...
6 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
I didn't get this title. In fact I don't remember seeing it on the newsstand. Good to see and let's face it, the Lee/Kirby run was fantastic and the Thomas/Buscema run was pretty good too.
ReplyDeleteYou missed a good little comic, Phil. Shame it never lasted more than 37 issues.
ReplyDeleteComplete FF was a book I rarely bought despite liking the FF and it being in most cases a really good comic, but I wasn't such a fan that I wanted to see a whole comic dedicated to them especially with the second feature being the Kirby FF reprints (that I already had in MWOM). I didn't think the FF had a strong enough brand recognition in the UK for a book all about them with no second (or third) different back up - ditto the recent Panini comic that was all FF (although this time I was buying it for the back up strips in colour) to me was doomed despite the films at the time - What do you think of the new FF film?
ReplyDeleteI hadn't kept my MWOMs, McScotty ('though I acquired replacements later), so it was a 'must have' for me as it reminded me not only of MWOM, but also Wham! Complete FF added The Invaders to it's line-up towards the end, but I doubt that they had any better brand recognition than the FF, so it was a bit of a redundant move. Haven't seen the new FF movie yet, McS, and I'm not sure I'll bother. Most of the reviews I've read have been pretty underwhelming.
ReplyDeleteUnlike Phil and Paul I had every single issue of The Complete FF and I enjoyed the original Lee/Kirby strips (which I'd never read before) more than the newer ones but what stands out in this selection are the ads for the Spider-Man "movie" and the 'Close Encounters' special - I also saw the Spider-Man film at the cinema and I quite liked it but you must remember that a) I was 12 and b) it was awesome just to see Spidey on screen - of course now I'd agree with you, Kid, that it was cr*p. As for 'Close Encounters' - on May 30th 1978 I went to see Star Wars and I bought 'Savage Sword Of Conan' #8 which I was reading while waiting in the queue and that 'Close Encounters' ad was on the back page of the mag - a boy walked by with a couple of his friends and saw the ad and said "I've seen that" in a show-offy way - always reminds me of the day I saw Star Wars. I didn't see 'Close Encounters' till years later on TV.
ReplyDeleteWhen I went to see the Spidey 'movie', CJ, I was around 19, but I remember well that even young kids were pretty soon bored with it, and started to run around the cinema in an attempt to amuse themselves. I seem to remember seeing Close Encounters in my local cinema years after the fact, with extra footage added. However, maybe I'm confusing seeing the original trailer there with a later TV 'director's cut' screening.
ReplyDelete