.jpg)
JANE RUSSELL again. What
can I say? My only excuse is that I
fancy her madly. So sue me.
Thursday, 18 September 2014
4 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
So that's twice for Jane (is it ?) and none for Marilyn Monroe. Kid, the big day is here - have you cast your vote for YES - oops, I mean NO.
ReplyDeleteAre you telling me you don't like Jane Russell, CJ? Look at her - she's all woman. We'll get around to MM in due course. Haven't voted yet, will do so later.
ReplyDeleteNot like Jane Russell - perish the thought. It's just that whenever I see Jane I always think of Gentlemen Prefer Blonds and Marilyn. As for the referendum - I was reading one online article that said an independent Scotland will end up like Greece while another one said an independent Scotland would become one of the world's richest countries - some contrast , eh ?
ReplyDeleteIf a politician ever tells you anything that turns out to be true, it's a coincidence, so I don't believe either side, who are only telling people what they think they want to hear. I just don't think it's a good idea to dispense with over 300 years of history so that a small bunch of politicians can have a greater profile on the 'world stage'. Politicians are only out for themselves - any benefits that fall on the public's side of the street are side-effects.
ReplyDelete