A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Saturday, 16 August 2014
THE MAGNIFICENT MIGHTY MOTH...
8 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Of course comics are not as funny as they used to be. What do you expect with a bunch of humourless tosspots cranking them out in between starting internet flame wars and writing self-congratulatory guff on their blogs?
ReplyDeleteI think that, in quite a few cases, it's a case of who you know, rather than what you know. What else can explain such mediocre art and scripts in a lot of today's comics?
ReplyDeleteIf you can dig out some of Dick Millington's Basil Brush strips from TV Comic that would be dandy!
ReplyDeleteNext time I dig them out, I'll do just that, Lee.
ReplyDeleteNo they are not as funny. Even back in the 90's I bought all the DC Thomson annuals one year for the grandkid and naturally I had to read them first. But there was nothing to even make me smile!
ReplyDeleteOne of the few 'recent' Annuals to make me laugh was a Bash Street Kids Annual that I got from a charity shop, JP. That was funny, but so few modern ones are. It's because they're aiming them at infants nowadays, it seems to me.
ReplyDeleteThat and political correctness!!
ReplyDeleteThat and some of the contributors not being as talented as the old guard in bygone years, methinks.
ReplyDelete