Below, the actual screening room, in 2007 or '08, recorded for posterity (by me) 33-plus years after first seeing the movie. It was projected from a booth at the back, though I no longer recall with any certainty whether it was straight onto the wall or a 'roller-screen' (the latter I think), but this was where an Inspector called back in 1974. (See what I did there?) Within a few months (at most) of this photo being taken, the entire school was demolished to make way for houses and flats, a new school building having already been built (and in use) on adjoining land.
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Thursday, 10 September 2020
AN INSPECTOR CALLS... ARE YOU GOING TO BE IN? (UPDATED)...
Below, the actual screening room, in 2007 or '08, recorded for posterity (by me) 33-plus years after first seeing the movie. It was projected from a booth at the back, though I no longer recall with any certainty whether it was straight onto the wall or a 'roller-screen' (the latter I think), but this was where an Inspector called back in 1974. (See what I did there?) Within a few months (at most) of this photo being taken, the entire school was demolished to make way for houses and flats, a new school building having already been built (and in use) on adjoining land.
8 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Well, I thought it was a great movie, same as me - er, you, Kid. (Now there's a surprise.) Has anyone else seen this film? Doesn't seem like it, going by the (lack of) response.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure if I've seen the film but I definitely know the original play because we studied it in school.
ReplyDeleteI've seen a couple of TV productions of it, CJ, but the movie is better. Sheer class.
ReplyDeleteI love Alastair Sim an excellent character actor. But sorry not a favourite of mine, I found the film really slowly paced and the dialogue stilted.
ReplyDeleteI wonder what age you were when you first saw it, McS? I'd say the pacing is necessary to help in the stage-by-stage development of the story (after all, it's not an action movie), which in turn accentuates the impact of each new revelation. Can't say I found the dialogue stilted, but it may be that it reflects its origins as a play. Time to give it another chance perhaps? (Might be on YouTube.)
ReplyDeleteYeah that's a fair point Kid as the last time I saw that film I would only have been about 18. Always willing to rewatch anything with Alastair Sim.
ReplyDeleteIt's a belter of a film. Caught it on a wet Wednesday afternoon with my mum(sadly passed) and we both thought it was great. A slow burner but a joy. Alastair Sim was a class act! As are you Kid. Happy, happy memories!
ReplyDeleteAs Triple F says in the comment after yours, McS, it's a slow burner, but I'd say it has to be in order to develop the plot and make each new revelation more effective. And you're bound to enjoy Alastair Sim's performance if nothing else - he's on top form.
ReplyDelete******
Thanks, Triple F, you're a class commenter (as are the others in this thread), and the movie is British film-making at its best. I must watch it again sometime soon.