A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Wednesday, 10 June 2020
PART TWO OF DON STARR'S APPOINTMENT WITH MR. BIG...
2 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteOn a different subject - I read your review of TV21 no 243 Special Edition and agree with what you wrote although the quality (or possibly style) of the illustrating did vary considerably between the various artists even in the issues I had as a kid, 1 - 105. For example comparing The Daleks in no.13 and 94.
Dave Walker
Regarding The Daleks specifically, DW, there was definitely a difference in style between Richard Jennings' and Ron Turner's interpretations of the metal-clad mutants, but both versions were of a good quality, art-wise. With the Special Edition though, some of the art just didn't cut the mustard in my opinion, making the issue a bit hit and miss.
ReplyDelete