![]() |
Images copyright MARVEL COMICS. Cover art JACK KIRBY |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Tuesday, 2 January 2018
KID KLASSICS: MORE LOOPY LAPSES IN LOGIC...
2 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
I did some detective work and confirmed that this issue was indeed produced under duress. This is what I posted to the Marvel in the Silver Age site, along with a link to Stan Lee's letter to Jerry Bails:
ReplyDeleteYou are absolutely right about Hartley rushing out the story due to deadline issues. Stan Lee wrote about it in a letter to Jerry Bails in 1963, explaining that it wasn't Hartley's "cup of tea" but he pinched hit in an emergency. Here is the line: http://themarvelageofcomics.tumblr.com/post/16306907460/a-letter-written-by-stan-lee-to-super-fan-dr
Marvel's staff was very small back then, so whoever could help out usually did. Ditko helped Stan out in a pinch a number of times, for instance, on Giant-Man, the first issue of Daredevil and inking a few stories, likely at the last moment. Dick Ayers once told me he came into the office a few times just to help out on deadlines (he almost exclusively worked at home) so everyone got the job done. one way or the other.
Thanks for that, Nick - took a look at that link and read the whole letter. I'll be going back later to read the comments (116).
ReplyDelete