Now this is better. A hint of KIRBY's abstract musculature remains, but thanks to the inks of VINCE COLLETTA (I think), the main drawing of THOR and HERCULES is far more visually convincing than the cover of THOR KING-SIZE ANNUAL #5, shown in a recent post. Now, here's a puzzle for you: Which of the four small cover panels is the odd one out - and why?
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Wednesday, 29 March 2017
NON-KLASSIC KIRBY KOMIC KOVERS: The MIGHTY THOR KING-SIZE ANNUAL #5...
It pains me to say it, but this JACK KIRBY cover is awful. It gives the impression that Jack wasn't really trying to produce great work (or was perhaps no longer capable of it), he was merely meeting his page quota by churning them out as quickly as he could with as little effort as possible. His art had become a poor parody of itself by this time, and he didn't even seem to care just how obvious it was. Oh, how the mighty had fallen.


