A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Saturday, 23 September 2017
A TALE WHICH MIGHT NOT ASTONISH YOU, BUT I THINK IT'S INTERESTING...
8 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Did not have any issues when younger but have picked a couple up over the years. I have no 87 nice Bill Everett art on SM, page ten always makes me think I am looking at SM no 1! How many issues did Bill Everett contribute to Kid? Great splash pages as well in these.
ReplyDeleteTerence.
Y'know, now that I think about it, I DON'T have #87, so it's only 2 in a row I've got, T. Number 87 was Everett's first ish as regular artist after inking a few issues by Gene Colan. He drew 8 issues in all over a 10 ish run (#96 was his last as regular artist), then inked a few more by another artist, if I recall correctly.
ReplyDeleteGil Kane drawing the Hulk was a glorious wee treat for me.
ReplyDeleteIt elevated my interest.
I think Gil Kane had Jack Kirby's Hulk from #5 of his own mag in mind when he drew him, Baab. That's who Kane's version reminds me of.
ReplyDeleteI agree,why not base it on the original.
ReplyDeleteThis period and when Gil started drawing Captain marvel with issue 17 ,
which I find is 1969 (two years later!) really blow me away.
The thin line he uses on the Hulk is lovely.
Ive been re-reading the Loeb and Sale's batman and it has a similar thin line.
You understand the fascination with an inked line on a page.
I bought a Green Lantern showcase edition to get more Kane and it did nothing for me.
So its the familiarity,and association.
I may have relative emotions attached to these stories.
I am not as intricate with my timeline as you are ,and its getting worse in some areas.
Do you ever get the year wrong?
If I've always known the year, Baab, then I never get it wrong. And, with British comics being dated, it's just about impossible to get the year wrong. With American comics though, unless I have some other means of corroborating the date, sometimes it's a 'guestimate' because a lot of them didn't always turn up on these shores until years after their release in the States. I doubt that I'm ever more than a year out though. For example, I holidayed in Blackpool in 1973 & '74, and both holidays have (to some degree) sort of merged into one in my memory. And the fact that US comics from the '60s were readily available on Blackpool spinner-racks, I'm occasionally not sure if I got some comic in '73 or '74. Other than that, I'd say I'm right with the dates most of the time.
ReplyDeleteThe cover for #88 is lovely. The background figure looks very Gene Colan-ish to me, but Subby and Attuma looks like Bill Everett drawings - wonder if they collaborated in it?
ReplyDeleteActually, DS, going by the positioning of the two main characters, I'd say they were drawn by Colan, so Everett probably only inked the cover.
ReplyDelete