Images copyright DC COMICS |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Tuesday, 25 April 2017
PART FIFTY OF FAVOURITE COMICS OF THE PAST - SUPERMAN'S GIRL FRIEND LOIS LANE #105...
8 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Only recent memories for me when I purchased it a couple of years ago! Nice art. As a matter of interest Kid do you have an example of the original Thorn from 1947? To me Thorn and Firehair look like sisters!
ReplyDeleteTerence
I'm sure I've got a reprint of one of the strips from the '40s in a comic somewhere, T, but I have no idea which one it is. That's something for me to keep an eye out for and add to this post when I find it. Dunno when that'll be 'though.
ReplyDeleteMy Lois Lane collection only spans the period of the 1971-1972 25-cent issues, but a title like “Death House Honeymoon” deserves a good read. I’ll search it out. Makes me wonder what happened to good story titles in modern comics.
ReplyDeleteAh, modern comics - nothing like their '60s and '70s (and sometimes '80s) predecessors, eh? Bring back the old days when comics were fun.
ReplyDeleteI dont think I had that particular issue Kid but as you know I also liked the Rose and the Thorn. DC he did a few a revamps (and of course this one was a revamp of the original 1940's character) the latest version turned out to be immortal and had a hand in setting up the Legion of Superheroes.
ReplyDeleteDidn't know about the latest version, McS, but she doesn't sound so appealing to me. That's the trouble with DC, isn't it? They're always introducing 'latest versions'.
ReplyDeleteDC have (imho) destroyed many of their core characters with constant changes for no real reason other than to attracted attention / get a quick (short term) increase in sales that usually result in them reversing any changes a few years later like Hal Jordan as Green Lantern, the Spectre etc (actually I'm not sure if they have reverted back to the original Spectre).
ReplyDeleteAgreed, McS. I've lost interest in just about all DC characters, apart from reprint editions or back issues from a time when they were the heroes I was familiar with, having grown up with them.
ReplyDelete