![]() |
Copyright relevant owner |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial content! With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, rueful reflections, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, poignant ponderings & yearnings for yesteryear! (To say nothing of a few profound perplexities & puzzling paradoxes thrown in for good measure.) Plus a bevy of beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes!
Friday 7 August 2015
KLASSIC KOMIC KOVERS - TARZAN'S FIRST DC ISSUE...
4 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
IIRC, Mark Evanier said on his blog (and/or in his Comics Buyer's Guide column) that Edgar Rice Burroughs Enterprises wanted Western/Gold Key to increase the frequency of Tarzan and Korak, and to publish comics based on John Carter, Pellucidar, and Carson of Venus. When Western couldn't handle the extra load (at least, not without sacrificing quality), ERB Enterprises made a deal with DC.
ReplyDeleteI've heard that DC's issues sold about half those of Gold Key. If that's true, it's hard to see why. Obviously, there was nothing wrong with the art. And DC was doing new stories. As I recall, GK's Tarzan comic seemed to have gone to all-reprints for some time before they lost the rights.
Maybe the Gold Key fans didn't like it because it was different from what they were used to. I admit that "my" Tarzan (and Korak) had Russ Manning art and painted covers.
DC's price increase to 25 cents, even with extra pages, may have also been a factor. That's pocket change now, but it may have been a lot for pre-adolescent kids ca. 1970. And back then, most comic book buyers were kids twelve and younger.
There's a coincidence for you, I picked this issue a not long ago, reasonable price too, so I was happy. It was pretty gripping so I've been meaning to track the others down,
ReplyDeleteThis was an earth-shaker for me. I instantly fell in love with Kubert's savage Tarzan, despite my affection for the sleek handsome Manning version from Gold Key. I felt the character in ways that had escaped me before; I grokked Tarzan at last.
ReplyDeleteRip Off
DC's Tarzan looked darker and grimmer, and Kubert's art was 'rougher' than that of the Gold Key comics, so that may have been a factor, TC. It just didn't look like Tarzan to Gold Key readers, perhaps. The 25 cents price applied only to the first three issues, so I'm not sure that it would have had a long-term impact on the rest of the series.
ReplyDelete******
I've only got the first 4 DC issues, DSE, which are an adaptation of Tarzan of the Apes, but they're a nice little quartet.
******
DC's Tarzan strip was visually more realistic, Rip, as opposed to Gold Key's bright, sunny jungles, and noble-looking ape-man. Over at Marvel, Buscema wanted to have him look more like Conan, but wasn't allowed to by the ERB estate.