Saturday 1 August 2015

KLASSIC KOMIC KOVERS - THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN #700...

Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

At last!  It was what we'd all been waiting for!  STEVE DITKO's hitherto unpublished (at least on the front of a comicbook) cover for AMAZING FANTASY #15, finally appearing on what was touted as the last issue of The AMAZING SPIDER-MAN.  So why did STAN LEE reject Steve's cover and have JACK KIRBY redraw it - photostatting the speech balloons and lower caption on Ditko's version and transferring them over to Kirby's?

Could it be that it looked as if Spidey was going to swing into the wall of the building rather than past it?  Or was it because he was revealing his secret identity to more than just the guy under his arm?  (Who we can assume was too frightened to be listening anyway.  And besides, the cover scene was merely symbolic.)  Did Stan just not like the composition of Steve's design, or was it for some other, indefinable reason?  I guess we'll never know for sure, but it was good to see the original finally grace an actual Spidey mag.

14 comments:

  1. I never knew this had happened! I've seen it many times as the unused AF#15, but I didn't know they had used it as the end of TAS-M vol.1. A fitting end, indeed!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was issued with a few covers, JP - this was one of the variant editions. It was soon demanding pretty high prices on the internet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wow, I've never seen this cover before, Kid - I mean I didn't even know there was a Ditko version of AF #15. I think Stan Lee made the right choice though, this cover seems a bit cluttered compared to the simpler Kirby version.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've shown it before, CJ, so see what you miss when you wander elsewhere? Actually, it proves that it's worthwhile to repeat stuff sometimes. Things about Kirby's version I didn't like were the fact that the guy under Spidey's arm seemed like a dwarf (with an uncanny resemblance to Boris Karloff - 'though I didn't mind that), and his (Spidey's) left arm was too long.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kid, feel free to repeat stuff - I only started reading your blog in late 2013 so I've missed lots of things. I do click on to those little widgets when I see something interesting but I still must have missed most of the former posts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Of course, there's always the option of going to the first post and working your way through, CJ. Why should I do all the work? However, seeing as it's you...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Col, I thoroughly recommend doing just that! I did when it was called Kiddin' Around and it was an amazing trip through time and space!!

      Delete
  7. CJ, meet JP - my new agent.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Actually, I have been back to the very beginning out of curiosity long before now so I know that the blog began then was abandoned for 6 months before starting properly but I haven't been all the way through from the beginning. I also know it used to be called Kiddin' Around :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. But now you know I'm serious about it, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I see some continuity between this and the published cover for Amazing Fantasies, in that I imagine the brief including something like: 'I want him bursting out of the cover!'. Aside from its iconic status, the published version isn't particularly good, Spider looks as if he's about to drop the guy like groceries out the bottom of soggy paper bag and what are those people doing on the roof?

    If bursting out the cover was a requirement of the brief, this version has a few problems. Indeed the building on the left does cramp the composition but the figure needs to be isolated, probably why they went for sky in the published version but the wrong colour in the background here doesn't help. I've got a suspicion this was taken from draft artwork, the perspective is completely skewed, not something I associate with Ditko, and the building on the left isn't aligned with the street. It looks more like an optional composition put forward for a brief but that's a bit speculative, it may just've been budget or time constraints.

    What's interesting about it, is that it already introduces the novel physical vocabulary with which Ditko renders Spidey. You can see it in the exaggeration of the reflex arch of Spidey's leading foot. That might be another reason why it was canned, too quirky.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's definitely finished artwork, DSE, as it appeared in its inked stage on the back cover of Marvelmania #2 in 1970. Also, the fact that it was lettered (the word balloons were photostatted and pasted on to Kirby's version, and the Spider-Man logo, omitted from #700, was statted and stuck over Ditko's own logo on the splash page) shows that it was more than a draft. The thing about it that jars with me is the way the bottom of the guy's left trouser leg sits on his calf.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I quite like the trouser leg riding up, I thought it was a nice touch, very Ditko.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Doesn't look as if it's riding up in quite the right way 'though - there's something amiss about it.

    ReplyDelete

ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.

I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.