Images copyright MARVEL COMICS |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Saturday, 18 July 2015
MARVEL POSTERS FROM THE '60s...
9 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
I always love that image of the Hulk dancing.
ReplyDeleteActually, he had ants in his pants.
ReplyDeleteKid can you tell us why companies redraw art? I can place all the pieces from actual comic books. Were they considered not polished enough for poster art? All of these have been re inked.
ReplyDeleteYup, that's what I was referring to when I said they'd been 'slicked up'. The reason seems pretty obvious, Phil. A drawing originally produced for a comicnook-sized panel would look pretty sparse when enlarged to poster size, so some extra detail was added to make each figure more suitable for its larger dimensions.
ReplyDeleteHad that Hulk poster on my wall for years as a kid, off the back of Fantastic mag issue 20? (don't quote me) - wish I'd kept the whole mag!, but I still have that page.The over-working 'finish' does kinda diminish the character of the original art though, well as we were used to seeing Kirby at least, which had detail but not due to cross hatching as a rule. They do have a nostalgic quality looking back at them now. Good to see these.
ReplyDeleteFunnily enough, I like that extra detail, PC, because it gives an extra dimension to the drawings. As you know, I have a full set of Fantastic and Terrific, and I'm surprised that not all 8 posters were used on the back pages. The Spider-Man one (sans colour) appeared on the cover of Pow! #2 to advertise the free iron-on transfer.
ReplyDeleteMarie Severin was likely involved in some of the noodling/touch-up work, however, it looks like John Romita may have done a little work on Iron-Man's face and possibly someone else on Dr. Strange. As I mentioned in another post, its also possible that John Verpoorten worked on some of these posters as well.
ReplyDeleteNick
Thanks Nick, if anyone's likely to know, it's usually you, so it's good to have your thoughts on the matter. Maybe they'll re-release them some day, eh?
ReplyDeleteOops, that should be comicbook, not comicnook in my reply to Phil. (Just like Stan Lee, I render it as one word, not two.)
ReplyDelete