Copyright DC COMICS |
A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Monday, 7 July 2014
THE ESSENTIAL SHOWCASE 1956-1959...
5 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
The Showcase/Challengers Of The Unknown looks fun but I'll pass on the others. Kid, you said the other day that super-hero comics were mainly aimed at boys (I agree) so who would be the intended audience for the Lois Lane comic ? Mrs. Superman and her super-baby - er, thanks but no thanks !
ReplyDeleteI'd say it was aimed mainly at the readership that bought comics, Col - boys - and their sisters perhaps. Remember, Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen mags were really only Superman comics in a thin disguise.
ReplyDeleteI'm mightily impressed by that Fireman Farrell cover. In fact, the artist who sprang to mind when I first looked at it was David Mazzuchelli. The figures and the inking style put me in mind of the work he produced on Daredevil and Batman a while back, which is high praise indeed. Even the interior page suggested similarities, and it certainly feels more modern than the rest of the examples shown here.
ReplyDeleteActually Kid, I didn't know that - I've wondered what Lois Lane did in her own comic. The covers always seem incredibly naff but that's typical of DC in those days before Marvel forced them to change.
ReplyDeleteThat's interesting, GB - I wonder if DM based his style on that kind of artwork deliberately, or was it just coincidence?
ReplyDelete******
It's hard to believe that DC editors looked down their noses at Marvel's output, and thought they were delivering the superior product, eh, Col?