A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Monday, 28 April 2014
"THE WARLORD & THE WITCH!" PART TWENTY-EIGHT OF FAVOURITE COMICS OF THE PAST...
6 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
I'm not sure I can work out why they changed the tilt of the landscape on the second one; I think I prefer the original, with Pietro dead-on and coming straight at us. Just a subtle change, but it upsets the composition all the same.
ReplyDeleteAt this time on the Avengers, Buscema and Palmer were a mighty team. Buscema had worked out the kinks from his earlier work on the title, particularly in regard to his figures, which were now beautifully proportioned; his women were as beautiful as any in comics; and Tom Palmer gave his work a sheen that no other inker quite managed to do.
Just wondering, Kid: who drew that Hulk page? At first I was thinking Trimpe or Severin, but the two small panels suggest Rich Buckler.
They changed the tilt to accommodate the bar code box without obscuring Cap's feet - simple as that, it seems to me, GB. As for the hulk pages, that's a tougher one. If it is by Rich Buckler, it'll have a mix of different styles, as was his wont back then, so that confuses my Spider-sense. It could be Buckler, but it could also be by Sal Buscema or Keith Pollard, but I just don't know is the honest answer. Where's Nifty Nick Caputo when you need him? He usually knows these things.
ReplyDeleteAnd here's me naively thinking that they made the change for artistic reasons.
ReplyDeleteIt was the Bruce Banner figure at the top which made me think of Buckler—like a cross between Adams and Buscema.
That original masthead is still the best one in my opinion and this period of the Avengers is the gold standard version with John Buscema the ultimate Avengers artist. I also have fond memories of his brother's art as it reminds me of reading The Avengers and The Savage Sword of Conan in '76.
ReplyDeletePrime time Buscema and Palmer.
ReplyDeleteThe team lost a bit of the magic (just a bit) when Palmer started finishing Buscema's looser pencils, but at this early stage it's certainly full pencils with the magic glow that Palmer could impart. Fantastic!
And the gloriously blowhard Arkon too!
Rip Off
Well, GB, not obscuring part of the art is artistic reason enough - in a practical kind of way. That Banner figure isn't as well drawn as the rest of the piece, to my eyes.
ReplyDelete******
It was a golden time for the team sure enough, CJ.
******
Buscema and Palmer - an unbeatable team, eh, Rip? Right up there with the best of them.