A cascading cornucopia of cool comics, crazy cartoons, & classic collectables - plus other completely captivating & occasionally controversial contents. With nostalgic notions, sentimental sighings, wistful wonderings, remorseful ruminations, melancholy musings, rueful reflections, poignant ponderings, & yearnings for yesteryear. (And a few profound perplexities, puzzling paradoxes, & a bevy of big, beautiful, bedazzling, buxom Babes to round it all off.)
Saturday, 25 May 2013
WHERE MIKE NOBLE HAS GONE BEFORE - Or - TO 'NOBLEY' GO - (Whichever one you prefer)...
5 comments:
ALL ANONYMOUS COMMENTS WILL BE DELETED UNREAD unless accompanied by a regularly-used and recognized
name. For those without a Google account, use the 'Name/URL' option. All comments are subject to moderation and will
appear only if approved. Remember - no guts, no glory.
I reserve the right to edit comments to remove swearing or blasphemy, and in instances where I consider certain words or
phraseology may cause offence or upset to other commenters.
Another great post. Fully agree with your comments! I keep an eye on contemporary comic art even though much of it does not engage me in the same way that the classics did (and still do). You could cite the nostalgia factor but I think it is as you say - clean uncluttered art telling good stories. Much of what I see has an over rendered generic look to my eye, and a shedload of Photoshop rendering and effects will not help bad layout and poor drawing. Thanks for sharing.
ReplyDeleteAnother thing that strikes me, Phil, having looked at some contemporary (superhero) comics recently, is just how many pages consist of 'talking heads'. Nothing seems to be happening, apart from people standing around talking. Comics don't seem to 'move' like they once did. Thanks for commenting.
ReplyDeleteI think part of the trouble is that many modern editors don't have a clue. In America, artists like Jerry Ordway and Steve Rude are being criminally underused, while more flashy but less talented artists (when it comes to storytelling technique) are being used in their stead.
ReplyDeleteInteresting views on contemporary comic art here, I think I concure with the sentiments. I'm not really a fan of the uniformly dense style that predominates today and it's a bit stiff and lifeless too. There's plenty of talent around but the comic marketplace has contracted to such an extent that i must be hard to get on the good side of a editor or art director, especially when they be such princesses too.
ReplyDeleteA lot of modern comics, although nicely rendered, look as if they've been copied or traced from photos that people have posed for, which probably gives them that stiff and lifeless look you mention, DSE. They don't seem to have that spontaneity that Kirby or Buscema (and a whole host of other greats) were able to capture.
ReplyDelete