Saturday, 8 April 2017

TRIPLE 'X' MARKS THE SPOT (THE DIFFERENCE)...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Okay, I might be over-egging the pudding here, but once
I'm on a roll I just can't stop myself.  (Roll & egg pudding any-
one?)  This is the 3rd X-MEN cover I've now shown that differs
from the published version.  Above is as JACK KIRBY drew it,
below is as it saw print after STAN LEE had sanctioned a couple
of changes.  Personally, I'm not convinced that the redrawn hand
is an improvement as, though it's more realistic, the fingers are
smaller than on the other one, making them mismatched.  The
altered mouth makes KA-ZAR look less chinless, but I could
have lived with the original (which is the one I first saw
on U.K. comic FANTASTIC #18 back in 1967).

Got a preference?  Reveal all in the comments section.
  

AGAIN - 'X' MARKS THE SPOT (THE DIFFERENCE)...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Strike while the iron is hot they say, so having piqued
your interest with the previous post, I thought I'd give you
more of the same.  Above is X-MEN #1 cover as originally
drawn, below as originally published.  I think STAN LEE
was right to make the changes as it made the characters
stand out more.  What think the rest of you?

If you have an opinion, feel free to leave it in our
ever-lovin' but neglected comments section.


'X' MARKS THE SPOT (THE DIFFERENCE)...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

When the 1st editions of MARVEL MASTERWORKS
first hit the scene back in the late 1980s, they weren't always
as archival in nature as they could have been.  That's because,
back in the '60s, changes were often made between something
having been drawn and being published, and very often the
only sources available to the Masterworks team were the
pre-published proofs before they'd been altered.

One such example is X-MEN #5.  Above is the cover as
Jolly JACK KIRBY originally drew it, and below is how the
published mag first appeared to the comics-buying public.  As
you can see, CYCLOPS and ICE MAN have swapped places,
and The ANGEL's face has been redrawn and highlights have
been added to his figure.  The corner box has also been altered,
but whether it was actually on the original production stat or
added by the Masterworks team to complete the cover is
uncertain.  (The cover art was sometimes photostatted
before all 'copy' and 'dressing' had been added.)

Anyway, a fascinating look at the 'before' and 'after'
process I'm sure you'll agree.  Want to see some more
examples?  Then say so in the comments section.


Friday, 7 April 2017

CURIOSITY COMICS: DC/HANNA-BARBERA TEAM UPS...


Images copyright DC COMICS & HANNA-BARBERA

The BATMAN meets TOP CAT?  Seriously?  Yup, it
happens in the back-up story of the above issue, and it's
played 'straight'.  I've only read the 'bonus features' so far,
so can't give you my informed verdict on the main tales, but
the BM/TC one was certainly interesting.  If you're looking
for something different, these comic mags might be right
up your alley.  (Hey, Top Cat allusion - funny.)

Available now from all good comicbooks shops.



RECOMMENDED READING: THE AVENGERS #5.1...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Like comicbooks the way they used to be done?  Then
you'd love this 5 part series which concludes with the above
issue.  Never mind, there's sure to be a collected edition if you
missed what went before.  I really enjoyed this series as it was
like returning to the '60s and my youth, which is always a good
thing in my estimation.  Nostalgia apart, it's an entertaining tale
in its own right, so even if you're a mere youngster, you'll still
enjoy it!  Avengers #5.1 - available from all good comic-
book shops right now.
   

BABE OF THE DAY - IMOGEN HASSALL...



The classy IMOGEN HASSALL
doing what she does best without even
trying - looking stunning.  (I'm told I've
got that exact same quality.)

Thursday, 6 April 2017

RECOMMENDED READING: THE MIGHTY WORLD OF MARVEL (VOLUME 6) #7...


Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

For all those who are fans of monthly mag The MIGHTY
WORLD Of MARVEL, the latest issue (#7) just hit the shops
today.  Featuring GUARDIANS Of The GALAXY, DOCTOR
STRANGE, & The SILVER SURFER, there's surely some-
thing in that line-up to appeal to the dedicated Marvelite.

As I say on a regular basis, there's a special kind of thrill
I derive from buying a title that I first started buying as a 13
year old lad another century ago.  To think that it's still going
strong (-ish) 45 years later is a satisfying source of wonder to
me.  Latch on to the magic that is MWOM by buying this
sensational 6th volume, 7th issue now!  Excelsior!

RECOMMENDED READING: X-MEN EPIC COLLECTION VOLUME FIVE...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Calling all X-MEN fans!  The latest EPIC COLLECTION is now waiting for you at your local comicbook store, so pop along and treat yourself to a copy in exchange for a few paltry pounds.  These are the stories which declared to the comics-buying public that the X-Men were back and here to stay, so if you didn't see these classics the first time 'round, now's your chance to catch up on the thrills you missed way back then.  Or if you read them at the time of publication, now you have a chance to re-aquaint yourselves with these iconic issues.

So what are you waiting for?  Read the spiel, then seal the deal!

BABE OF THE DAY - EMILY PROCTER...



H'mm, EMILY PROCTER sizzles
sensationally as she scans the room to
see where I am.  You gotta hand it to
her - the lady has taste!

RECOMMENDED READING: CLASSICS ILLUSTRATED DELUXE #1 - THE WIND IN THE WILLOWS...


Copyright relevant owners

Here's one I heartily recommend to everyone.  Nothing can replace the book of course, but this is a worthy attempt to portray this classic tale by KENNETH GRAHAME in the graphic novel medium.  The art, by MICHEL PLESSIX is sumptuous, and my only reservation is that the illustrations would obviously benefit from being printed in a larger format.  This is the first volume in the deluxe series and I'm sure you'll just love it, even if (unlikely as it seems) you've never heard of the River-Bankers and Wild-Wooders before.  Available now from all good book stores.
   

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

INHUMANS PRIME ONE-SHOT...


Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

Haven't read this ish yet so dunno what it's about, but to
be honest, it's the JACK KIRBY variant cover that grabs me
so I'm not really all that interested in the contents.  If, like me,
you're a fan of JK (and no, Melvin, I don't mean ROWLING),
this is one you'll want for your collection.  And where would you
be likely to obtain this impressive item you may be wondering?
Why, surprisingly, all good comics stores will be happy  to
cater to your comicbook cravings.  Pop in soon!

RECOMMENDED READING: X-MEN #1 & GIANT SIZE X-MEN #1...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Are you an X-MEN fan?  Then you'll love these two
reprints featuring your favourite mutants.  Available in
your local comicbook store for a mere 50p (or so) each,
these mags are bound to win a place in your heart as
well as your comics cabinet.  Grab 'em now!

BABE OF THE DAY - RHIAN SUGDEN...



She can hardly believe her eyes as she
spies me across a crowded beach.  "Is that...
is that the famous KID ROBSON?" asks an
incredulous RHIAN SUGDEN, lifting up her
sunglasses for a better look.  Yes, Rhian, it is!
There's only one of me you know, so you'd
better snap me up while you can.

KULL IN MONSTERS ON THE PROWL #16...


Images copyright MARVEL COMICS

Sometimes you get lucky - and so it was on this occasion.  I first read this KULL tale in the pages of MARVEL U.K.'s weekly comic SAVAGE SWORD Of CONAN in 1975-ish, but when, several years later, I acquired #s 1-11 of Kull's colour U.S. mag, I didn't realise this story wasn't included in that run.  When Kull's 'regular' mag first debuted, it was intended as a quarterly publication, but it stalled after issue #2.  Seven months later, MONSTERS On The PROWL took up the reins, and Kull was meant to continue in that periodical.

However, for whatever reason, plans changed again and Kull next popped up in #3 of his own mag three months after MOTP #16.  I didn't know about this comic until regular commenter McSCOTTY mentioned it in response to a recent post, so I immediately tracked one down on eBay for just over £4, including postage.  As I said, sometimes you get lucky, and though the mag isn't pristine, it's good enough to add to my collection and fill the sequential gap between issues 2 & 3 of KULL The CONQUEROR's colour series.

The Kull tale is only 10 pages long, so there's a couple of 1960s stories by LEE, DITKO and KIRBY to round off the required page count, with "MISTER MORGAN'S MONSTER" being particularly memorable.  Tell you what though - instead of merely telling you about this comic, why don't I just show you a few select pages so you can all see for yourselves?  You'd like that?  Good, here you are then - enjoy.




Tuesday, 4 April 2017

BABE OF THE DAY - SOPHIA LOREN...



SOPHIA, when I said pop out for some
milk for my tea, that's not quite what I had
in mind.  Never mind though, it'll do.

DALEKS SNOWSTORM...



Every Christmas, I put out on display
three or four 'snowstorms', but this is one
I don't have.  I'd like to have it though, so
if you've got one lying around, send it to
me at once.  "You will obey!"

THE KENROY AUTO-CADDY...



Anyone remember the KENROY Auto-Caddy?  There was one in our kitchen in the 1960s and '70s, and also my grandparents'.  Of course, when teabags took off, the Auto-Caddy's fate was sealed and it became redundant, but it was once a common feature of U.K. kitchens in an age now vanished forever.
  

Monday, 3 April 2017

KID'S KLASSIC (KIRBY) KOMIC KOVERS: FANTASTIC FOUR #39...


Image copyright MARVEL COMICS

I didn't mind VINCE COLLETTA inking JACK KIRBY's
pencils on FANTASTIC FOUR, which he did from #s 40-43,
as well as Annual #3.  In fact, I think he did a good job, but poor-
quality reprints lost much of his fine detail and unfairly damaged
his reputation.  Just thought I'd throw that in for free, 'cos it was
FRANK GIACOIA (using the name Frank Ray) who inked
the contents of the above issue, with the cover being inked by
CHIC STONE and WALLACE WOOD (who inked the
figure of DAREDEVIL).  Pretty good result, eh?

(Once again, Jack has made The THING, in this
case a remote-controlled robot, far too small.)

FRED FLINTSTONE'S FABULOUSLY FANTASTIC FRICTION-DRIVE FLIVVER...


My very own FRED FLINTSTONE FLIVVER - snapped in my
back garden half an hour ago.  The box is for the remote-control
version, and is a reproduction I made myself from an original

It always irks me when I can't be more specific about
dates.  Trouble is, I never knew the exact dates of some of
the events from my early life, and have to retroactively work
them out from other factors, like which house I lived in at the
time, whether I'd started school, etc.  So that's why I can say
only that I got my FRED FLINTSTONE's FLIVVER in
1962 or '63.  That's as  close as I can nail it down to.

There were different versions of this toy - a remote-
control version and a friction-drive one.  Most sites show
two different-looking flivvers, but it wasn't quite as simple
as that because, as well as the two different-in-appearance
versions, there was also a friction-drive one which was in-
distinguishable from the remote-control one - except for
not having a remote-control (obviously).  All three
versions were made by MARX TOYS.

Here's the other version of the friction-drive toy.  Who knows,
perhaps a remote-control version of this one was also made?

But don't be fooled.  When I say remote-control, I'm
not talking about a modern, infra-red remote-control, I'm
talking about one that was attached to the flivver by a cord,
in the same way that TV remote-controls once operated.  I
seem to faintly remember my flivver having a remote-con-
trol, and it lay for years in a box in a cupboard long after
the toy itself had been consigned to oblivion.

Trouble is, around the same time I had Fred's car, I
also had a little race track with small magnetic cars, which
was operated via the same kind of remote-control as Fred's
'deluxe' flivver, so I'm not sure if the remote-control which
lay in my cupboard for years belonged to the flivver or the
race track.  It annoys me not being able to recall with ut-
most certainty which toy it accompanied because I'm
therefore unsure which version I actually owned.

Looking at the remote-control in this pic, it doesn't look like the one
I recall, so maybe mine belonged to my race car set.  Hold it - just
seen another one in a book about MARX TOYS, and the remote-
 control is similar to the one I remember - different colour though 

However, having spent four paragraphs on the sub-
ject, it's not really important to the point of this post.  I
said earlier that the flivver eventually disappeared, apart
from a few disassembled parts lying in the same box as the
remote-control, but I had the little plastic Fred driver for
at least ten years before getting rid of most of the sur-
viving toys from my childhood in the early '70s.

Little Fred used to accompany me on visits to my
grandparents every Sunday.  After tea, I'd excuse my-
self and take a walk along to my former neighbourhood,
there to gaze upon the two houses in which I (and Fred)
had once lived.  It was a strange sensation to return Fred
to his old environs, but it helped me to reconnect to my
past in a much more tangible way, even though it's
difficult to explain in precisely what manner.

And another look at my own toy

Little Fred saw the inside of four houses in his ten or
so years, including the one in which I now reside.  Close
to 20 years ago, I was able to obtain (at immense expense)
a replacement Fred and his flivver, and one glance immedi-
ately returns me to an earlier point in time that I'm loath to
leave.  I once re-created my childhood experience of touring
my former neighbourhood with Fred in tow, though on that
occasion, it was with 'new' Fred, not 'old' Fred.  To me
however, they were one and the same.

It's strange to think that I've now had replacement
Fred for nearly twice as long as his predecessor - it just
doesn't seem like it.  In fact, the near-quarter-of-a-century
gap between the two Freds no longer seems to have existed,
and it feels like I've only ever had one Fred, tucked away in a
cupboard for years before being happily rediscovered.  Some
people might think that, as it's not my original Fred, it surely
can't have the same nostalgic or sentimental draw, but trust
me, there's an odd kind of magic that operates on such oc-
casions, and, in my mind, it's the same Fred (and fliv-
ver) that I first got as a kid 54 years ago.

"Wilma, I'm home!"

The remote-control version - with a different remote-
control to the one shown further up the post

BABE OF THE DAY - LORNA WILDE...



Did you ever watch classic TV comedy show
WHATEVER HAPPENED To The LIKELY
LADS?  At BOB and TERRY's local pub worked
a barmaid called GLORIA, played by a reet lovely
lass by the name of LORNA WILDE.  H'mm, I
can't help but wonder if she lived up to her
surname?  (Whaddya think?)

Sunday, 2 April 2017

VANISHING VIEWS, NARROWING HORIZONS...



The above photo captures the view from the top of the hill
where I live, as it was on August 2nd 1988.  It was essentially
unchanged from when we'd first moved into the house on June
14th 1972.  However, when I took the photo, we'd been back in
the house for a year and a day, having moved away five
years earlier and then returned four years later.

The photo below was taken today, and is the view as it is
now.  Not quite so expansive, is it?  Funny how everything
seemed much cleaner, brighter and more colourful back then,
whereas today, things seem darker, duller and more bleak - or
is it just me?  The skies are shrinking, the horizons are nar-
rowing, and the colours are fading far too quickly.

Anyway, glad to have cheered you all up.


HAVE YOU GOT YOUR OWN STINGRAY?



Just had to print this ad because it's so nice.  Looks like
the work of RON EMBLETON, and someone has made
fridge magnets out of it and is selling them on eBay.

REFLECTIVE REPOST: WHOSOEVER HOLDS THIS HAMMER...



Above is the original final caption box of THOR'S origin from
JIM #83 before it was changed to how it saw print, below.  (With
Thor missspelt as THORR.)  Interesting to see that perhaps Thor was
intended as a try-out character to test reader reaction before launching
him in a series.  I say "perhaps" because this may merely have been a
gimmick to make readers think they had a say in what was published.
I'd imagine that it's more than likely the next few episodes were
already lying in a drawer in STAN LEE's office.


UPDATE:  (See "Can anyone kindly
explain this mystery to me?" post.)

For those who are interested, here's the inferior, re-lettered
version from the first printing of the THOR MASTERWORKS
book, and subsequent re-printings up to the softcover release.


When I first saw the above abomination, I re-lettered a
new one (by hand) with amended spelling from the original -
and sent it to TOM BREVOORT for use in future reprintings.
It was never needed though, as superior stats of the original
proofs were eventually discovered.


Below is the original and my re-lettered version, side-by-side.

BABE OF THE DAY - JOLENE BLALOCH...



DOLLY PARTON liked JOLENE BLALOCH so much,
she wrote a song about her.  That, of course, is an obvious lie,
but I have to fill these captions somehow, so any old p*sh will
do for me.  Besides, who reads this stuff anyway?  You're
only here to look at the pictures - so feast your eyes.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...