Thursday, 17 January 2013

SON OF DENNIS THE MENACE?

 
 
Going by this week's BEANO, it looks like we could now be reading
about the son of the original DENNIS THE MENACE, whose grown-up
self is the current Dennis's dad. On just what evidence do I base this
seemingly wild conjecture? Look at the contemporary Dennis's grand-
father in the page below - that's the dad of Dennis that all those of a
certain age remember, up until he underwent a sudden transformation
into a younger incarnation not too long ago.
 

Of course, this theory is not without its problems. If true, it would
mean that WALTER THE SOFTY and all Dennis's other pals are also the
sons of the originals. it would also suggest that the current GNASHER is
either the doggy offspring of the original - or even the son of the original
GNIPPER, whose current incarnation is the son of the new Gnasher.
Yeah, it's complicated, isn't it?
 
Full marks must go to D.C. THOMSON for giving its readers a larger
than usual issue for the standard price - it makes up in some way for
the over-priced Christmas edition back in December. (Let's hope they
don't give with one hand and take away with the other anytime soon.)
The Beano is a right good read (in the main) these days, and I heartily
recommend it to those looking for an amusing way of whiling away
twenty minutes or so in a harmless fashion.
 
Remember - "Never be without a Beano!"

6 comments:

Dave Dee Dozy Beaky Mick n Tich said...

Theres also a picture of wartime Dennis so our Dennis might be the grandson of the original?

Kid said...

Dennis didn't make his comics debut 'til 1951, but it's always possible that the wartime one is the same one, although he'd have looked a bit younger. If we were talking about real people that is, because - as we all know - comics characters tend not to age. Unless the writer wants them to, of course.

I said it was complicated.

DeadSpiderEye said...

So Dennis's dad would be Dennis?

Kid said...

Yup. Although he'd probably now be called 'Den'.

Anonymous said...

So all the times they celebrated his birthday it was a sham. Its not even the same character!!! What a rip off.

Kid said...

Only if my conjecture is correct, but one can never be too literal about these matters. Maybe the writer is just indulging himself.